Guest WhammeWhamme Posted May 31, 2003 Report Share Posted May 31, 2003 Would 'Duplicates share END costs' be a fair 0 cost modifier? (Character already takes STUN and other bad effects as one)Essentially if one gets tired, they both get tired, but they share their total END so that's okay... It does halve END costs if one of them isn't doing anything tho... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snarf Posted May 31, 2003 Report Share Posted May 31, 2003 It seems like there are as many advantages as there are limitations to me. Maybe it should just be a 0 point option. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobGreenwade Posted May 31, 2003 Report Share Posted May 31, 2003 Just to make sure I'm understanding... if the character has, say, 50 END, then when he's duplicated both duplicates have a common pool of 100 END from which to power everything they do. Is that right? If I'm understanding it right, then yes, I'd just call it a -0 Limitation, for the reasons already stated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WhammeWhamme Posted May 31, 2003 Report Share Posted May 31, 2003 Yeah. Collectively the two have a doubled END pool. K, thanks. I was thinking so... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.