Your comments indicate there is always a "True Form". I can think of characters who have no "true form", or more accurately, more than one "true form". ie all the character's forms are natural to the character, so no one form can be classified as the "true form". On this basis, it would seem any of the forms could be the base form and pay for Multiform. True?
It makes little difference to the question previously asked, since such a character logically would not revert - all his forms are natural, so the default "persistent" nature of multiform should stay in place.
Question
Hugh Neilson
Your comments indicate there is always a "True Form". I can think of characters who have no "true form", or more accurately, more than one "true form". ie all the character's forms are natural to the character, so no one form can be classified as the "true form". On this basis, it would seem any of the forms could be the base form and pay for Multiform. True?
It makes little difference to the question previously asked, since such a character logically would not revert - all his forms are natural, so the default "persistent" nature of multiform should stay in place.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts