For my campaign, I have all longbows requiring some flavor of Concentration. Makes total sense. I have a super-archer, who isn't pleased with it. We've gone round and round about it, but the equipment is built to the campaign rule, and that stands.
However, he keeps asking if he can 'buy it off,' as it's equipment the answer is no. More specifically, he wants to be able to pick up "any bow" and not have the Concentration limitation apply; the only thing I can think of is to build an NPA: +1/4 Custom Advantage that removes the limitation on any bow up to N Active Points.
I haven't seen a reference to this anywhere in the text, and I'm pretty strict on maintaining adherence to the RAW wherever possible. While I won't ask here "what else would work?" I am asking "Is this legal? Can he use an NPA to remove a limitation, and would the math work in equal measure? -1/4 Lim being paid off with a +1/4 NPA?"
Question
Thia Halmades
Hey Steve, Thia here;
For my campaign, I have all longbows requiring some flavor of Concentration. Makes total sense. I have a super-archer, who isn't pleased with it. We've gone round and round about it, but the equipment is built to the campaign rule, and that stands.
However, he keeps asking if he can 'buy it off,' as it's equipment the answer is no. More specifically, he wants to be able to pick up "any bow" and not have the Concentration limitation apply; the only thing I can think of is to build an NPA: +1/4 Custom Advantage that removes the limitation on any bow up to N Active Points.
I haven't seen a reference to this anywhere in the text, and I'm pretty strict on maintaining adherence to the RAW wherever possible. While I won't ask here "what else would work?" I am asking "Is this legal? Can he use an NPA to remove a limitation, and would the math work in equal measure? -1/4 Lim being paid off with a +1/4 NPA?"
Thanks in advance,
~DEM/TH
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts