This question appears a few lines down and is reprinted below in red. My question is simply, wouldn't the last limitation be worth -1/4, not -1/2, consistent with "Variable Limitation" being half the modifier of the total limitations which must be applied to the power?
Or am I missing something here?
OK: I've read the previous "Variable Limitations" thread, and I think I understand, but I'd like to clarify:
Given the following example:
VPP: Magic Pool: 60 points
Control Cost: 13 points (Powers can only be changed in
Magical Lab -1/2, Only Magic Powers (Slightly Limited)
-1/4, All Powers Require at least an additional -1/2
Limitation to be determined when power is bought -1/2)
Allowing that a GM can rule either for or against such a Limitation for his own campaign, is the final Limitation legal according to the FREd rules?
Question
Hugh Neilson
This question appears a few lines down and is reprinted below in red. My question is simply, wouldn't the last limitation be worth -1/4, not -1/2, consistent with "Variable Limitation" being half the modifier of the total limitations which must be applied to the power?
Or am I missing something here?
OK: I've read the previous "Variable Limitations" thread, and I think I understand, but I'd like to clarify:
Given the following example:
VPP: Magic Pool: 60 points
Control Cost: 13 points (Powers can only be changed in
Magical Lab -1/2, Only Magic Powers (Slightly Limited)
-1/4, All Powers Require at least an additional -1/2
Limitation to be determined when power is bought -1/2)
Allowing that a GM can rule either for or against such a Limitation for his own campaign, is the final Limitation legal according to the FREd rules?
Thanks for your input.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts