A quick clarification, please: The "Toolkitting" box on page 6E1 230 explains, basically, how to arrive at the Growth costs by applying a standard set of Limitations to the cost of the respective Size Template. One of these Limitations just happens to be Costs Endurance (-1/2)...
...so, since it could be argued that the Power's Active Points are really in the Template, should the END cost of Growth be based on that or just on the actual points invested in Growth itself?
(For background, a house rule I'm considering would among other changes alter the total point costs of the larger Templates. I was looking into how to derive the cost of Growth from the new totals when the above thought crossed my mind.)
Question
Chimera 12
A quick clarification, please: The "Toolkitting" box on page 6E1 230 explains, basically, how to arrive at the Growth costs by applying a standard set of Limitations to the cost of the respective Size Template. One of these Limitations just happens to be Costs Endurance (-1/2)...
...so, since it could be argued that the Power's Active Points are really in the Template, should the END cost of Growth be based on that or just on the actual points invested in Growth itself?
(For background, a house rule I'm considering would among other changes alter the total point costs of the larger Templates. I was looking into how to derive the cost of Growth from the new totals when the above thought crossed my mind.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts