Mental Paralysis Entangle 1d6, 6 Resistant Mental Defense, Alternate Combat Value (OMCV Vs DMCV; +1/4), Vs EGO Not STR (+1/4), Personal Immunity (+1/4), Line of Sight (+1/2), Sticky (+1/2), Area of Effect (16m Cone; +1/2), Takes No Damage From Attacks (+1), Invisible Power Effects: Fully Invisible (+1), Backlash (+1/2)
Mental Man attacks a 14 EGO mook 3m in front of him, electing to commence the power's cone where he stands (such that Mental Man is within the area of effect) -- knowing that his personal immunity will preclude him from all of his own power's effects. He successfully positions his cone, and he then rolls to make sure he hits the mook ... and the GM confirms a successful hit on the mook's DMCV. 1d6 is rolled to determine the 'body' of the Entangle, and a 1 comes up on the die yielding a 1 BODY, 6 Resistant Mental Defense Entangle.
Our mook has no mental powers, but has 14 EGO, allowing him to roll 3d6 to try to break out of the Entangle. He rolls three dice with a result of three 6's ... an amazing roll, but only 6 BODY ... which isn't enough to overcome both the BODY and the Resistant Mental Defense of the Entangle, so the mook remains Entangled.
Mental Man then decides he wants to release the mook from the Entangle ... but did not buy the 'dismissible' option on it. He elects to use his 8d6 Mental Blast to blow the Entangle down, even though it takes no damage from attacks. His thinking is that the Mental Paralysis power (including all advantages other than Personal Immunity -- such as Area of Effect, Sticky, Fully Invisible, Takes No Damage From Attacks, etc.) is preempted by Personal Immunity and, thus, just as the power did not stick to him ... or affect him while in the Area ... the Takes No Damage From Attacks advantage should be treated similarly and, thus, should have no bearing with regard to his Mental Blast.
Two questions:
How much Backlash STUN damage does the mook take from his roll of three 6's that failed to break the Entangle?
Can Mental Man expend both a Phase and END to attack and potentially break his Mental Paralysis that Takes No Damage From Attack ... because of his Personal Immunity to the power (including its advantages ... such as AoE, Sticky, etc.)
Question
Surrealone
Mental Man has an entangle built as follows:
Mental Paralysis
Entangle 1d6, 6 Resistant Mental Defense, Alternate Combat Value (OMCV Vs DMCV; +1/4), Vs EGO Not STR (+1/4), Personal Immunity (+1/4), Line of Sight (+1/2), Sticky (+1/2), Area of Effect (16m Cone; +1/2), Takes No Damage From Attacks (+1), Invisible Power Effects: Fully Invisible (+1), Backlash (+1/2)
Mental Man attacks a 14 EGO mook 3m in front of him, electing to commence the power's cone where he stands (such that Mental Man is within the area of effect) -- knowing that his personal immunity will preclude him from all of his own power's effects. He successfully positions his cone, and he then rolls to make sure he hits the mook ... and the GM confirms a successful hit on the mook's DMCV. 1d6 is rolled to determine the 'body' of the Entangle, and a 1 comes up on the die yielding a 1 BODY, 6 Resistant Mental Defense Entangle.
Our mook has no mental powers, but has 14 EGO, allowing him to roll 3d6 to try to break out of the Entangle. He rolls three dice with a result of three 6's ... an amazing roll, but only 6 BODY ... which isn't enough to overcome both the BODY and the Resistant Mental Defense of the Entangle, so the mook remains Entangled.
Mental Man then decides he wants to release the mook from the Entangle ... but did not buy the 'dismissible' option on it. He elects to use his 8d6 Mental Blast to blow the Entangle down, even though it takes no damage from attacks. His thinking is that the Mental Paralysis power (including all advantages other than Personal Immunity -- such as Area of Effect, Sticky, Fully Invisible, Takes No Damage From Attacks, etc.) is preempted by Personal Immunity and, thus, just as the power did not stick to him ... or affect him while in the Area ... the Takes No Damage From Attacks advantage should be treated similarly and, thus, should have no bearing with regard to his Mental Blast.
Two questions:
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts