Re: Invisibility vs. Sight
Kenn touched upon the part of the rules debate that I believe makes the best illustration of the player's false logic.
Replace the radar dish with the amazing Radar Boy, and replace the dot with Radar Boy's finger. When Radar Boy, who can detect and target people invisible to the sight group, points at Invizodork does Radar Boy's hand vanish because it's now a visual representation of Invizodork? That's the argument you'd have to make to support the player's viewpoint.
At the core of the issue is the misinterpretation of the power limitation. The description leaves it moderately ambiguous as to what happens when a sense power is actually affected as mulitple sense groups. If the dish is vulnerable to radar and sight, then why wouldn't Radar Boy's hand be unable to point at Invizodork? Why? Because it's pretty clearly emplied by the two examples they give that one sense (Radar Group) is represented by the focus and the second sense (Sight Group) is the character's ability to make use of the focus. Both of which are required to use the power but are apples and oranges as far as sense affecting powers are concerned.
In my personal opinion I don't see why this would even be a limitation, outside of the limitation of already having a focus. The only thing I can think of is if you created a power such as Mental Power Sight, that was vulnerable to invisibility for both the Mental group and the Sight Group. However, I wouldn’t call this a limitation either, because it’s the other side to the double bladed sword of getting the sense modifiers from the sight group for free but having them vulnerable to the sight sense group. Or am I missing something?
