The DNPC rules define Incompetant as "-20 points or lower" but also say that what matters is "how competant the DNPC is in relation to the character." (Emphasis added.) Does this mean:
a. DNPC has -20 base points, but total cost may be higher with disads,
b. DPNC has -20 total points including points from disads, or
c. DNPC has -20 points relative to the PC (ie, a 350-point superhero could theoretically have a 330-point "incompetant" DNPC).
Choice c seems silly, but OTOH a & b are not relative to the PC's level. What constitues "incompetant" in a superheroic campaign might not be the same as in a heroic game.
Question
bigdamnhero
The DNPC rules define Incompetant as "-20 points or lower" but also say that what matters is "how competant the DNPC is in relation to the character." (Emphasis added.) Does this mean:
a. DNPC has -20 base points, but total cost may be higher with disads,
b. DPNC has -20 total points including points from disads, or
c. DNPC has -20 points relative to the PC (ie, a 350-point superhero could theoretically have a 330-point "incompetant" DNPC).
Choice c seems silly, but OTOH a & b are not relative to the PC's level. What constitues "incompetant" in a superheroic campaign might not be the same as in a heroic game.
Thanks,
bigdamnhero
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts