torchwolf Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 Well, not exactly a house rule. A quick-reference chart for additional detail when using Sectional Defenses; while primarily useful for Fantasy Hero and Heroic campaigns, some other campaigns campaigns also use Hit Locations and Wounding, and so detailing the Limitation might be useful. The “expanded” Limitation values for 7- or less are optional (intended for additional granularity), and are listed in parenthesis to make this clear. These are just extrapolated values. Roll x/216 % Limitation Lim. (expanded) 18- 216 100.00 0 17- 215 99.54 0 16- 212 98.15 0 15- 206 95.37 -¼ 14- 196 90.74 -½ 13- 181 83.80 -½ 12- 160 74.07 -¾ 11- 135 62.50 -1 10- 108 50.00 -1 ¼ 9- 81 37.50 -1 ½ 8- 56 25.93 -2 7- 35 16.20 -2 (-2 ¼) 6- 20 9.26 -2 (-2 ½) 5- 10 4.63 -2 (-2 ¾) 4- 4 1.85 -2 (-3) 3- 1 0.46 -2 (-3 ¼) These are the statistical odds of rolling a specific number or less on 3d6; note that the sectional defenses Limitation on 6E2 212 differ slightly from the RAR Limitation on 6E1 389 in values. RAR Limitation values: 15- (-0); 14- (-¼); 8- (-1 ¾); 7- (-2). Roll Location x/216 % Limitation Lim. (expanded) 3 Head 1 0.46 -2 (-3 ¼) 4 Head 3 1.39 -2 (-3) 5 Head 6 2.78 -2 (-3) 6 Hands 10 4.63 -2 (-2 ¾) 7 Arms 15 6.94 -2 (-2 ¾) 8 Arms 21 9.72 -2 (-2 ½) 9 Shoulders 25 11.57 -2 (-2 ½) 10 Chest 27 12.50 -2 (-2 ½) 11 Chest 27 12.50 -2 (-2 ½) 12 Stomach 25 11.57 -2 (-2 ½) 13 Vitals 21 9.72 -2 (-2 ½) 14 Thighs 15 6.94 -2 (-2 ¾) 15 Legs 10 4.63 -2 (-2 ¾) 16 Legs 6 2.78 -2 (-3) 17 Feet 3 1.39 -2 (-3) 18 Feet 1 0.46 -2 (-3 ¼) Using this table, you can add up the “x/216” specific areas covered, and use the nearest number on the above table to find the Limitation value. Remember that this only gives an accurate value if you add up the total; if you apply the Limitation separately for each piece of sectional armor you will get incorrect results; if you have different protection values, use the lowest protection value (DEF) covering all the protected locations, and then buy some extra protection value only for the areas it applies to; this will get you a more appropriate Limitation value for the entirety of your armor. Incidentally, the % chance also correspond to the percentage Mass and Cost of a full suit of armor in tables for sectional armor as listed on 6E2 212 and in Fantasy Hero 5th Edition. When calculating this, you can do it by location since it doesn't affect the Limitation value. NOTE: Some Locations, such as the head, will add up to slightly more than actual values due to rounding errors; in such cases, see the table below for more exact values. Roll Location x/216 % Limitation Lim. (expanded) 3-5 Head 10 4.63 -2 (-2 ¾) 6 Hands 10 4.63 -2 (-2 ¾) 7-8 Arms 36 16.67 -2 (-2 ¼) 9 Shoulders 25 11.57 -2 (-2 ½) 10-11 Chest 54 25.00 -2 12 Stomach 25 11.57 -2 (-2 ½) 13 Vitals 21 9.72 -2 (-2 ½) 14 Thighs 15 6.94 -2 (-2 ¾) 15-16 Legs 16 7.41 -2 (-2 ½) 17-18 Feet 4 1.85 -2 (-3) This is just a variant of the above chart, divided into sections per body part instead of 3d6 Roll for ease of reference if you have standard-sized armor (covering entire limbs, etc.). Hope anyone finds this useful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmjalund Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 Re: Sectional Defenses Has anyone got rules for Hit locations for beings of significantly (or even campaign specific) Body designs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alibear Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 Re: Sectional Defenses The 5e Hero System Bestiary has such a beast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ice9 Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Re: Sectional Defenses While these seem consistent with the existing values, they both seem incorrect in terms of the actual probabilities. A chart based on the actual chances (as in, a 50% chance of working is a -1 limitation), would look something like this: 18- 216 100.00 -0 17- 215 99.54 -0 16- 212 98.15 -0 15- 206 95.37 -0 14- 196 90.74 -1/4 13- 181 83.80 -1/4 12- 160 74.07 -1/2 11- 135 62.50 -1/2 10- 108 50.00 -1 9- 81 37.50 -2 8- 56 25.93 -3 7- 35 16.20 -5 6- 20 9.26 -9 5- 10 4.63 -20 4- 4 1.85 -50 3- 1 0.46 -200 Now yes, the last few limitation values are massive. But that's basically appropriate - armor that only applies 1/216 of the time should be basically free, if it even exists to begin with. Of course, this is ignoring the "oven mitt" factor. Hand-only armor should probably be capped at a lesser limitation value, because it always retains some utility in grabbing dangerous objects; even more so if the character in question uses HTH attacks much. Feet armor has some utility value too, but not as much, it's often superceded by the various movement abilities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torchwolf Posted March 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Re: Sectional Defenses While these seem consistent with the existing values' date=' they both seem incorrect in terms of the actual probabilities.[/quote'] Yes, I did it this way for the convenience of anyone wanting to use the Limitation as-is, with a few options for variation. A chart based on the actual chances (as in, a 50% chance of working is a -1 limitation), would look something like this: 18- 216 100.00 -0 17- 215 99.54 -0 16- 212 98.15 -0 15- 206 95.37 -0 14- 196 90.74 -1/4 13- 181 83.80 -1/4 12- 160 74.07 -1/2 11- 135 62.50 -1/2 10- 108 50.00 -1 9- 81 37.50 -2 8- 56 25.93 -3 7- 35 16.20 -5 6- 20 9.26 -9 5- 10 4.63 -20 4- 4 1.85 -50 3- 1 0.46 -200 Now yes, the last few limitation values are massive. But that's basically appropriate - armor that only applies 1/216 of the time should be basically free, if it even exists to begin with. Of course, this is ignoring the "oven mitt" factor. Hand-only armor should probably be capped at a lesser limitation value, because it always retains some utility in grabbing dangerous objects; even more so if the character in question uses HTH attacks much. Feet armor has some utility value too, but not as much, it's often superceded by the various movement abilities. Yes, that represents the statistical probabilities in Limitations values. However, I generally go by the Limited Power guidelines on overall effectiveness: -1/4 lose about a fourth -1/2 lose about a third -1 lose about half -1 1/2 lose about two-thirds -2 lose almost all Way back during early 4th Ed FH, I made a chart for this that used -1 at the 10- level, increasing or decreasing by 1/4 for each step up or down (-1/4 to - 2 3/4), but eventually changed the -1 to the 11- level just to give better limitations at the lower levels (down to -3). If I'd redo that chart today, I think I'd double the values at the 6- and lower levels though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmjalund Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Re: Sectional Defenses remember the probabilities change when you use high shots/low shots or even target a hit location Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torchwolf Posted March 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Re: Sectional Defenses remember the probabilities change when you use high shots/low shots or even target a hit location Yes, that's a problem at the lower end of the Limitations scale (equivalent of 5- or lower), since you often aim high or head if you really want to take someone out and don't mind the resulting gore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ice9 Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Re: Sectional Defenses Actually that's an interesting point regarding partial defenses - it makes quite a large difference whether your foes know about it. For instance, let's take somebody with armor on the top half of their body only: If it's an invisible force field (and the foes don't know about it), then it's probably useful more than half the time - the character can look around corners or stand behind low walls to maximize shots on their upper body. If it's plate mail, then it's probably useful less than half the time - the character's foes will intentionally target the lower body whenever they can. Also, I wonder if the vulnerability of the body part should be considered. Stomach and Shoulders have the same chance to be hit, but a stomach hit will be more deadly. At that point, we're diverging pretty significantly from the existing rules though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.