I haven't worked with Damage Negation much, so I wasn't sure how it worked in these scenarios.
Scenario 1
Attacker has a 1d6 HKA (3 DC) and 15 STR, yielding 6 DC with STR included.
Defender has 4 levels of Damage Negation.
Is the Attacker's attack reduced to zero, since the Damage Negation is greater than the base attack's power? Or is it 2 DC, the added STR boosting the attack to a total of 6 DC, and then 4 DC are removed?
Scenario 2
Attacker has a 2d6 RKA (6 DC) with Armor-Piercing (+1/4), Personal Immunity (+1/4) and Reduced END (+1/2), bringing the attack up to 60 Active Points.
Defender has 6 levels of Damage Negation.
Do the Attacker's non-damaging Advantages count into the calculation before reducing the attack by 6 DC, or is only the Armor-Piercing Advantage included? Am I left with a 1d6 RKA or a smaller amount of damage?
Question
Steve
I haven't worked with Damage Negation much, so I wasn't sure how it worked in these scenarios.
Scenario 1
Attacker has a 1d6 HKA (3 DC) and 15 STR, yielding 6 DC with STR included.
Defender has 4 levels of Damage Negation.
Is the Attacker's attack reduced to zero, since the Damage Negation is greater than the base attack's power? Or is it 2 DC, the added STR boosting the attack to a total of 6 DC, and then 4 DC are removed?
Scenario 2
Attacker has a 2d6 RKA (6 DC) with Armor-Piercing (+1/4), Personal Immunity (+1/4) and Reduced END (+1/2), bringing the attack up to 60 Active Points.
Defender has 6 levels of Damage Negation.
Do the Attacker's non-damaging Advantages count into the calculation before reducing the attack by 6 DC, or is only the Armor-Piercing Advantage included? Am I left with a 1d6 RKA or a smaller amount of damage?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts