Common Modifiers issue

[unclevlad]

45 points:  Multipower, 60-point reserve, all slots Half Range Modifier (+1/4), Reduced Endurance (1/2 END; +1/4) (90 Active Points); all slots OIF (-1/2), Limited Range (-1/4), No Knockback (-1/4)

3 points:  Blast 12d6 (60 Active Points)

 

30 points:  Multipower, 60-point reserve, (60 Active Points); all slots OIF (-1/2), Limited Range (-1/4), No Knockback (-1/4)

3 points:  Blast 12d6 (60 Active Points)

 

90 points:  Multipower, 60-point reserve, all slots Half Range Modifier (+1/4), Reduced Endurance (1/2 END; +1/4) (90 Active Points)

6 points:  3 points:  Blast 12d6 (60 Active Points)

 

These 3 show that the common limitations are being applied to the slot costs...but not the common advantages.  OTOH, in a VPP, both are applied properly.

 

Makes no sense that the common advantages woudn't influence the slot costs in the MP.  It's not likely to be a big factor, but in some exotic cases...seems like it could be.

[Simon]

6E1 405

[unclevlad]

OK, so the HD implementation adheres to the rules...but I'll repeat, it makes no sense to have the rules work this way...on multiple levels.

[Simon]

Are you just venting or do you actually want me to respond to that?

[unclevlad]

Venting.  There's nothing you can do about it.