cyst13 Posted June 17, 2004 Report Share Posted June 17, 2004 Re: Generation Ship Campaigns Reply to Keith Curtis: I agree with most of what you said in your last post, though my emphasis would be a bit different. One point you made which I found to be true but a bit disingenuous was that the plots you listed could also be set on a desert island or some other closed society. I agree, but the same can be said of everyone else's ideas as well. A generation ship is a subset of the isolated society setting. What differentiates the generation ship setting is what you had touched upon; you're surrounded by space and stars and possibly aliens and your 'island' is a mechanical device that requires maintenance. I didn't give any ideas of my own for plots primarily because I was just browsing and didn't want to get deeply involved in this thread. Since you challenged me, though, I'll give it a shot. In the games I've been running over the past year, I've been very interested in PCs who are ambassadors of a sort who negotiate between different factions. I can very much see this on a generation ship. Assuming you have enough people aboard to avoid genetic damage from inbreeding, you'd probably have a population of at least 10,000. This is the size of most medium cities in medieval Europe. That's certainly large enough to have distinct factions. And the mere presence of factions does not mean violent confrontation. There are numerous factions in my home city of Portland based on race, class, religion, jobs, etc. and they rarely resort to violence. When they do, it is very brief. Most factional differences are acted out in negotiations or perhaps protests. I could envisage a campaign in which the PCs are diplomats who have to mediate in labor disputes, diffuse factional anger, negotiate with the government, and similar duties. While this may be business-as-usual since it would be their official jobs, I don't think it would be boring. To my mind, it's violence that tends towards boring repetition. Having to work with people as people is far more intricate and complex than people as targets. To clarify my original intent in posting, I wasn't out to criticize you guys so much as to challenge you. It has become something of a knee-jerk response in the RPG community to set games in violent situations and let the PCs fight their way through it. I think this not only lowers the quality of the games, but also presents a poor image to prospective players of RPGs. I've been trying to actively recruit females to play RPGs, and I always have to get past the stereotype of it being just an excuse to hack and slash. Most women are not interested in this. However, girls roleplay all the time. What else is playing 'House' or 'Dolls' than freeform RPGs. If we could develop plots for RPGs that focus on PCs interacting peacefully with the world around them, it would be much easier to recruit women into the hobby. Also, I believe our imaginations are at the root of our perceptions of the world. I don't want to get all Jerry Falwell here and start blaming RPGs for social violence. I do think, though, that if we can prioritize peaceful interaction over violence in our games, and find ways of making those interactions as challenging and exciting as violent confrontations, it will reinforce our impulses toward valuing peaceful responses in real life. We have to imagine peace and value it before we can actualize it. P.S.: To the cynic who suggested that no societies have existed for extended periods of time without ending in anarchy or tyranny, may I point out that you are currently living in such a society. The U.S. has had a 200+ year history without anarchy or despotism. It doesn't look to end anytime soon. While I'd be the first to agree that we've not been perfect (and Native Americans and African Americans may disagree about whether we've had tyranny), this has been a relatively stable society which has been much better for most people than what is typically imagined in dystopic sci-fi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ternaugh Posted June 17, 2004 Report Share Posted June 17, 2004 Re: Generation Ship Campaigns You know this also reminds me of the Star Trek episode "The World is Hollow and I Have Touched the Sky". I am midly surprised that no one else mentioned it. That story assumes a strong central figure which forces order (in this case, a very reliable computer with obedience chips in everyone). Unfortunately, by its very nature, this type of society does not tend to produce adventure-worthy conflict (either of a social or a violent nature) without introducing an outside agent not under the full control of the central figure, like the Enterprise crew, or some sort of disaster that the central authority cannot handle by itself. Now, if the computer suddenly goes offline.... JoeG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greatwyrm Posted June 17, 2004 Report Share Posted June 17, 2004 Re: Generation Ship Campaigns P.S.: To the cynic who suggested that no societies have existed for extended periods of time without ending in anarchy or tyranny' date=' may I point out that you are currently living in such a society. The U.S. has had a 200+ year history without anarchy or despotism. It doesn't look to end anytime soon.[/quote'] While the US has had a rich and colorful history, don't forget that we're still one of the younger countries in the world. We didn't even make it a full hundred years before our first civil war. Before that, the federal government had to use the army to put down the Whiskey Rebellion. The America of the 1950's probably looked like a tyranny if your neighbor thought you were a Communist. I love my country, but it's not like we haven't had our problems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyst13 Posted June 17, 2004 Report Share Posted June 17, 2004 Re: Generation Ship Campaigns Yes, I agree with all that. But we are still here. We survived all that and this is still a reasonably nice place to live. There's no reason a generation ship would be doomed to social disintegration because of 'human nature'. If we can do it, they might alsol. And if 200+ years isn't long enough for you, the Venetian republic lasted from somewhere in the 1100's until 1797. While also not a utopia, it also was by and large a nice place to live for most Venetians. Nobody on this thread has estimated how long this generation ship would be en route, but seven hundred years seems like it would be sufficient. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starblaze Posted June 18, 2004 Report Share Posted June 18, 2004 Re: Generation Ship Campaigns Or it goes insane and starts creating an elaborate system of security clearances thinking that communists are starting to, but stop that is a different game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starblaze Posted June 18, 2004 Report Share Posted June 18, 2004 Re: Generation Ship Campaigns That story assumes a strong central figure which forces order (in this case, a very reliable computer with obedience chips in everyone). Unfortunately, by its very nature, this type of society does not tend to produce adventure-worthy conflict (either of a social or a violent nature) without introducing an outside agent not under the full control of the central figure, like the Enterprise crew, or some sort of disaster that the central authority cannot handle by itself. Now, if the computer suddenly goes offline.... JoeG Or it goes insane and starts creating an elaborate system of security clearances thinking that communists are starting to, but wait that is a different game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentor Posted June 18, 2004 Report Share Posted June 18, 2004 Re: Generation Ship Campaigns The original question was to imagine an rpg campaign set aboard a generation ship. Business as usual is poor storytelling. So I'd say no. Keith "Conflict is the essence of drama" Curtis Yep. Adventuring requires conflict. Not absolutely necessarily violent conflict, but conflict of some sort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ternaugh Posted June 18, 2004 Report Share Posted June 18, 2004 Re: Generation Ship Campaigns Or it goes insane and starts creating an elaborate system of security clearances thinking that communists are starting to' date=' but wait that is a different game.[/quote'] I'm sorry, Citizen. That information is not available at your Clearance. Please report to HPDMC for rerprogamming. Thank you Joe-G-FRD-2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaeto Posted June 19, 2004 Report Share Posted June 19, 2004 Re: Generation Ship Campaigns The computer is your friend... The computer knows what is best for you.... The computer is also off it's chips! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greatwyrm Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 Re: Generation Ship Campaigns The computer is also off it's chips! Kaeto-B-KLN-1, please report to sector DED for re-education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guzalot Posted August 18, 2004 Report Share Posted August 18, 2004 Re: Generation Ship Campaigns There are so many otions for this type of campaign. What if the society on the ship was in anarchy but suddenly some of the "original crew" start coming out of cryogenic suspension? Maybe the "frozen ones" (the PCs) are thought of as gods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomas Posted August 18, 2004 Report Share Posted August 18, 2004 Re: Generation Ship Campaigns Let's turn it around. How would you run such a campaign? What would a sample adventure* be like? I've been toying with an idea of RPGing a closed society with the characters being newly-minted cops when a serial murder takes place. They spend the time both investigating the murder and dealing with a panicked population. A generational ship would be an ideal setting for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCoy Posted August 18, 2004 Report Share Posted August 18, 2004 Re: Generation Ship Campaigns I didn't give any ideas of my own for plots primarily because I was just browsing and didn't want to get deeply involved in this thread. Since you challenged me' date=' though, I'll give it a shot. In the games I've been running over the past year, I've been very interested in PCs who are ambassadors of a sort who negotiate between different factions. I can very much see this on a generation ship. Assuming you have enough people aboard to avoid genetic damage from inbreeding, you'd probably have a population of at least 10,000. This is the size of most medium cities in medieval Europe. That's certainly large enough to have distinct factions. And the mere presence of factions does not mean violent confrontation. There are numerous factions in my home city of Portland based on race, class, religion, jobs, etc. and they rarely resort to violence. When they do, it is very brief. Most factional differences are acted out in negotiations or perhaps protests. [/quote'] I would assume 1000* adults launching with the ship, with 10,000 frozen foti and a sperm bank to expand genetic variability after they get there, wherever "there" is. Assuming equal numbers, male/female, an equal birth rate, each female having two pregnancies, and earth-normal occurance of multiple births, and everyone living 100 years, the population goes overr 10,000 in Generation 25, some five hundred years after launch. In Generation 11, everyone is descended from all of the original crew members. *Rule of thumb in ecology, species with fewer than 50 breeding pairs probably will have inbreeding problems, one with more than 500 probably will not. Mass is going to be a consideration, go with the lowest safe number. Don't see how in that small number, with everyone realted, no pockets of isolation, factions could develope UNLESS something goes wrong. To clarify my original intent in posting' date=' I wasn't out to criticize you guys so much as to challenge you. It has become something of a knee-jerk response in the RPG community to set games in violent situations and let the PCs fight their way through it. I think this not only lowers the quality of the games, but also presents a poor image to prospective players of RPGs. I've been trying to actively recruit females to play RPGs, and I always have to get past the stereotype of it being just an excuse to hack and slash. Most women are not interested in this. However, girls roleplay all the time. What else is playing 'House' or 'Dolls' than freeform RPGs. If we could develop plots for RPGs that focus on PCs interacting peacefully with the world around them, it would be much easier to recruit women into the hobby. [/quote'] Here we're geting more into the conventions of the Action-Adventure genre. Yes, it's simplistic, but it's also escapist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.