LoS versus Continuous

[Rebar]

Is there much point in taking Continuous if one already has LoS? I mean, technically there's a difference but, with LoS, they can simply hit the target again the next phase (unless the target goes behind cover).

 

I liked the Uncontrolled but to buy Cont forst means the wohle thing is still +2. Might Continuous be a lower advantage?

[Christopher]

Re: LoS versus Continuous

 

LOS is how you target.

Continuous is how long your Power works (and if it costs endurance).

 

Having to use another attack action to affect the target vs. just paying endurance and having your full phase seems a big difference. Unless, the rules differe that much from 6E.

[Rebar]

Re: LoS versus Continuous

 

:doh:

 

I'm such a stupidhead. When I first composed the question, I was thinking that LoS meant you didn't need to make an attack roll.

 

I've been playing for 20 years, and that's how rusty I am that I forgot how LoS works.

[Christopher]

Re: LoS versus Continuous

 

No problem

[Escafarc]

Re: LoS versus Continuous

 

LOS has at least 41 meanings:http://www.acronymfinder.com/LOS.html

 

My favorite is: Large offspring syndrome (cloning)

[Rebar]

Re: LoS versus Continuous

 

LOS has at least 41 meanings:http://www.acronymfinder.com/LOS.html

 

My favorite is: Large offspring syndrome (cloning)

 

Sorry 'bout that. I thought I'd been diligent enough to spell it out at least once in the first post.

 

Line of Sight adv.: +1/2.

[dmjalund]

Re: LoS versus Continuous

 

Prophet & LoS