Jump to content

Double Focus Limitations


Super Squirrel

Recommended Posts

I'm working on magical spells for Easthaven Divine Magic. Divine Magic requires a Holy Symbol to cast or change spells in the Pool giving the Pool and all powers in it OAF(Holy Symbol; Difficult to Optain New Focus; -1 1/4). In one of my spells I'm making, the spell requires a second focus to cast the spell.

 

Is it possible to put two focuses on a spell when one comes from the VPP itself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Double Focus Limitations

 

I'm working on magical spells for Easthaven Divine Magic. Divine Magic requires a Holy Symbol to cast or change spells in the Pool giving the Pool and all powers in it OAF(Holy Symbol; Difficult to Optain New Focus; -1 1/4).

Normally the part about a focus being difficult to obtain only applies if your Focus is Expenable. I certainly wouldn't allow it in the case of a priest's holy symbol that is not consumed by the spell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Double Focus Limitations

 

In general, I'd say that a multiple foci is worth the lim of the *most* restrictive Focus, and probably not any additional limitation. There are some exceptions to this, such as with the "Arrangement" limitation.

 

In Fantasy Hero, they got this backwards. There is an example of a magic sword and gauntlet combo. The sword is an OAF, and the gauntlet is an OIF. You need both to make the magic work. So what should the total limitation be? The FH book says it should be -1/2, the lesser of the two limitations - completely wrong, of course. It should be the greater of the two (at least), -1, since the power can be stopped with the ease of taking away an OAF. Yes, you might say that it's worth a little more than -1, since you need both foci, but probably not much more than that, maybe -1 1/4, which, from what the Duke said above, is what 5ER seems to say. (I don't have 5ER, just FREd.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Double Focus Limitations

 

Phil---

 

just to put recognition where it's due, Mudpyr8 was the one quoting 5E. Duke (me :D) was the one making a light-hearted remark about why he stomped all over this thing when he first went through his FREd. As Mudpyr8 pointed out, if I pay endurance for the shots, I get additional bonuses per bullet (in a manner of speaking).

 

For what it's worth, we do exactly what you do: the most limited focus bonus is the bonus you recieve. If a construct is really way out there, I might consider (heavy "might" here) allow a -1/8.

 

-1/8 is, in my games, essentially: I don't think there's any valid reason to give you a bonus, but I am willing to give you a chance to prove it to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...