Jump to content

Shadowcats Vehicular Insanity Shop: The Strangest Submarine design


shadowcat1313

Recommended Posts

Re: Shadowcats Vehicular Insanity Shop: The Strangest Submarine design

 

kinda silly your mix attack with a boomer

especially if you are going to use it to place infiltration units ashore or near enemy units

 

besides you can place synthetic passive sonar on the hull to give you a better view with out having a tail to worry about

 

only 4 trident D5 is only 1/4 of the Vanguard class and to have the same throw wt of tridents you are going to need 16 of them to replace the 4 that are already in service that is up to 32 crews needed

 

and who is going to order a boomer to hunt other subs

I can see a combo of a ssbn and a ssgn but both of these types of boats are ment to reach out an touch somebody never to get into knife fighting range

 

an Ohio SSBN has 24 tubes(22x7 tomahawks plus lockout for seals on the ssgn conversions)

so going with a split load of SLBMx8 tubes and 8tubes each with 7 tomahawks would give a better balance but would still be a boat that does not get close to the enemy

 

this sound like a politico trying to combine systems and make a jack of all trades and master of none

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Shadowcats Vehicular Insanity Shop: The Strangest Submarine design

 

Frankly, the ecological niche for ballistic missile submarines is pretty damn small these days. Vertical Launch Tubes are standard equipment in attack subs these days, and if they launch ballistic missiles in addition to the cruise missiles that are frequently used, why not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Shadowcats Vehicular Insanity Shop: The Strangest Submarine design

 

you don't send boomers into harms way

the converted Ohio class had 24x Trident 2 D-5 SLBM

when they went to being infiltration boats they took off all the Trident D-5s

and replaced 2 of the launch tubes with a lock out system for delivering commandos and their equipment for platoon strength

the other 22 tubes got shortened and each now holds 7 cruise missiles

the longest ranged cruise missles have a 2500 km range with a 200kt warhead or 250 mile range with a 1000lb HE or bomblet dispenser

the Trident D5 has a range of 4000 miles

why go down to 1/4 your throw weight if you have no plans on reducing your force below 64 missiles with 4 subs

for those cruise missiles to be of use

the sub will need to be in or near the white sea or in the Black sea to hit deep inside Russia(no other real targets unless you go after India or China

 

if these subs launch there is a good chance their location will be given away

do you risk giving an unlaunched D-5's location away in a conflict that had peopel shooting?

Frankly' date=' the ecological niche for ballistic missile submarines is pretty damn small these days. Vertical Launch Tubes are standard equipment in attack subs these days, and if they launch ballistic missiles in addition to the cruise missiles that are frequently used, why not?[/quote']
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...