Jump to content

Super Squirrel

HERO Member
  • Posts

    14,352
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by Super Squirrel

  1. Re: Longest Running Thread EVER

     

    I think we should factor in the WGAC Index. That stands for "Who Gives A Crap?" It uses the number of views a thread has to modify its number of replies. Based on my entirely unscientific observation, the average thread has roughly ten time the number of views as it does replies. So the WGAC Index is calculated by (views / replies * 10).

     

    Here are the WGAC Indices for the threads with the most replies:

     

    WAG1 .334

    WAG2 .304

    A&Q .657

    Q&A .589

    random about random .792

    WAG1.5 .286

    random 1.028

    catsuit 2.239

    opposites game .375

     

    You can see that the game threads suck for WGAC, and sex definitely sells. So if we multiply the total replies by the WGAC Index, here are the current thread champs with their modified size:

     

    WAG1 4834

    catsuit 2976

    WAG2 2400

    random about random 2260

    A&Q 2177

    Q&A 1736

    random 1524

    WAG1.5 530

    opposites game 440

     

    WAG1 still wins by virtue of sheer volume, but one Catsuit reply is worth almost seven WAG1 replies. Now we have a more realistic goal to which this thread can aspire, a possible methodology to calculate how well we're doing, and scientific proof that I've got way too much time on my hands this morning.

     

    -AA

    I appoint you official WGAC man. Keep us informed of our progress.
  2. Re: Longest Running Thread EVER

     

    If the Word Association Game was the longers thread ever than this thread has to beat #14476 posts. Can we do it?
    I'm sure we have already in words. :D

     

    Let's tackle Catsuit first, then worry about the WAG threads. Maybe, as a pre-emptive strike... someone should create WAG 4.

  3. Re: Longest Running Thread EVER

     

    The one major government report that was done on DDT' date=' back before it was outlawed, a many-hundred-page thing, said [i']conclusively[/i] there was no evidence for any harmful environmental effects, but the guy in charge of the agency at the time went ahead and put it on the "ban" list because he'd made a lot of political deals based on this upcoming report, and had promised various people the research would find DDT harmful.

     

    As for the oil thing...there's been a growing number of scientists over the last decade who don't believe oil's going to run out (not completely) because they are coming to believe the term "fossil fuels" is a misnomer in the case of oil. More evidence is accumulating that oil is being produced now through the actions of deep-crustal bacteria called "extremeophiles" who die in the too-cold temps and low pressures of the surface. Another point of questioning is this:

     

    "Many other bodies in the solar system have the exact same petrochemical signatures as our so-called 'fossil fuels'. Does anyone seriously believe there was ever a thriving dinosaur-and-fern-forests biosphere on Titan, or some of the other moons in the outer solar system?"

     

    I'm not saying which way I'm leaning on this (oil) one; even if it's true that oil isn't going to run out completely, I'd dearly love to see some real/b], funded work on alternatives, like worthwhile fuel cells and ways to efficiently store hydrogen for them. In that, at least, I have no doubt the environment would be better off if we stopped mass combustion of 'fossil fuels', regardless of those fuels' true origins.

    For harmful effects on DDT, look at the Bald Eagle.

     

    I don't care about Oil. Hybrids are dirt cheap and use little gasoline. My roommates have one and average 47 miles a gallon. It is only time before 47 miles a gallon goes to 80+ miles a gallon or gone altogether. I'm not sure what percentage of oil usage that is, but it has to be pretty significant.

×
×
  • Create New...