Jump to content


HERO Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About BeZurKur

  • Rank
    Skilled Normal
  • Birthday 11/02/1970

Profile Information

  • Occupation
    High School English Teacher
  1. How would you build a "Time Pause" power that affects one person at a time. My first instinct says entangle, but that strong characters can step back into normal time easier doesn't seem right. I then considered an Ego Based Entangle, but as Nitrosynchretic pointed out above, that only affect the attack value. What would you suggest?
  2. Hey that's me on episode 114 of Canon Puncture advocating for HERO! Just thought this crowd may be interested. Check it out. http://www.canonpuncture.com/
  3. Re: Help with Old West Weapon design Tasha, why Reduced End and Charges?
  4. Re: Help with Old West Weapon design Tcabri, you're right. Those costs don't match up. I believe it is an error in the active cost. A 2d6-1 attack is 25 points; 31 points with a +1 Increased STUN Multiplier. The books lists it as 34. It should read an A/R of 31/8. Let's run down building the power. First is Base plus Advantages 2d6-1 RKA is 25 points +1 STUNx is a +0.25 Advantage That comes to an Active Cost of 31 Then apply Limitations Focus -1.0 Charges -0.75 Str Min -0.5 Beam -0.25 Real Weapon -0.25 Total Limitation of -2.75 31 / 3.75 = 8.3 r
  5. Re: Help with Old West Weapon design The STUNx is an advantage, so it is done first and modifies the Active Cost. Treat the bonus to OCV as an adder: in other words, buy the Combat Skill Level bonus to OCV and just add (no multiplication) the cost to the active cost. Then apply the limitations.
  6. Re: Help with Old West Weapon design The order of operations for HERO is you first figure out the cost with Advantages to come up with the Active Cost. You then apply the Limitations to get the Real Cost. The distinction between Active Cost and Real Cost may seem like just semantics, but it is critical -- especially when designing Campaign Guidelines. For the .38 Derringer, it has no Advantages, so the Active Cost remains at 15. Now to figure out the total limitations... OAF: 1 Two Charges: 1.5 Beam: 0.25 Real Weapon: 0.25 Str Min of Four: 0.25 Total = 3.25 but when
  7. Re: What Comes Next: Champions variant Your NPC is more interesting than the background, and IMO, that's good. Hero was designed in the 80's and has mechanics that reinforce an old-school way of thinking: that is, the game is about the PCs and not the setting. Complications are central to that design. I encourage you to have your players design their characters first. If they want to work together, let them make that arrangement. Then, based on the setting, ask them what the conflicts for their characters should be and create the complications from that. Once you have all that, you'
  8. Re: How would I do this? I can't speak for the OP, but Hugh's scenario doesn't seem so bad providing the campaign has firm guidelines, or even better yet, guidelines plus statted equipment/weapons. In the case of the latter, the DC 3 or 6 weapon may already be bought to zero Endurance or charges, leveling the advantages between both. I don't know. We'd need the OP to confirm that. Doc, I don't think Hugh was saying "nay" to the idea, so much as pointing out the implications, which as he said, maybe the desired effect. Also, your example I think assumes +1 per DC of the att
  9. Re: How would I do this? How about having damage done be standard effect so the damage roll is eliminated? To throw the variable back in, use the margin of success to add to the damage. You replace a damage roll with some simple math. Every point of MoS adds one point of damage. KA would need to be scaled proportionately to normal damage. It is capped at the max damage. It still gives CV an added bonus, but everyone benefits from it.
  10. Re: Solo Adventure Combat System Bob, checkout these two products: Chain Reaction and Mythic. The former is a table-top miniature game that can be played solo. It uses a reaction table with different outcomes based on the situation, the model, and the roll. Mythic is for role-playing solo or automating other aspects of an RPG. It may be bogged down a bit for combat, but it produces incredible situations based on a series of yes/no questions that you ask the system. Because you always ask the questions, they will always be of interest to you. Anyhow, these are two different approache
  11. Re: The Hero System is bland and over complicated To be fair, saying you need anything other than the core books -- actually, just the PHB -- to play D&D 4e is like saying you need the Hero Ultimate Powers to play Hero. Neither is true. I'm getting the vibe that some posters are defending their point personally. I certainly can't speak for everyone, but just to reiterate, my points are: This tread started because someone posted a youtube video that made a side comment of Hero that it was bland and complicated. Without making any judgement of the system itself, I agree i
  12. Re: The Hero System is bland and over complicated Why does it have to be either or? I say have the mega-volumes, but then create a complete (as in one book) setting with the necessary rules included. If the players want to do more with it, they are directed to the toolbox.
  13. Re: The Hero System is bland and over complicated What does YouTube have to do with anything? I'll discuss why Hero has the stigma by some as being bland and complicated (and many would agree), but if this thread is shifting to "he is wrong for having an opinion" or "wrong for sharing it on YouTube" then we are the elitists. EDIT: Just wanted to add I agree with this:
  • Create New...