Jump to content

Battleship? Sub? Naw....BATTLESUB!!!


proditor

Recommended Posts

Re: Battleship? Sub? Naw....BATTLESUB!!!

 

That one should have been in Star Hero. This one is Pulp:

 

sous_marin_surcouf_small.jpg

 

Nah, that's real. The Lorelei....now that's pulp. ;)

 

http://wgordon.web.wesleyan.edu/kamikaze/films/japanese/lorelei/index.htm

 

(Basically the Sucouf with some modifications, and in Japanese service).

 

EDIT: I actually had a vehicle sheet for the Surcouf n here n the CHmpaions forum (It was pre Pulp), and more pictures can be found of that beauty on my vehicle picture webpage, here: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/champsstuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Battleship? Sub? Naw....BATTLESUB!!!

 

Nah, that's real. The Lorelei....now that's pulp. ;)

 

http://wgordon.web.wesleyan.edu/kamikaze/films/japanese/lorelei/index.htm

 

(Basically the Sucouf with some modifications, and in Japanese service).

 

EDIT: I actually had a vehicle sheet for the Surcouf n here n the CHmpaions forum (It was pre Pulp), and more pictures can be found of that beauty on my vehicle picture webpage, here: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/champsstuff

 

I just find the Battlesub you posted above looks too modern and wrongly streamlined for a Pulp setting. I wish I could draw well enough to do one justice. I'd go for something more Art Deco with 30's style streamlining and then hidden rivets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Battleship? Sub? Naw....BATTLESUB!!!

 

I just find the Battlesub you posted above looks too modern and wrongly streamlined for a Pulp setting. I wish I could draw well enough to do one justice. I'd go for something more Art Deco with 30's style streamlining and then hidden rivets.

 

Oh absolutely. There was the battlesub from....crud...what was the anime again? Not the one with tiny twin 5" turrets (Or at least, they look like twinned 5's.) but a full suite of Yamato style cannons and a hyped up floatplane that launches like a torpedo. Darn...I'll try and remember which one it was and post something.

 

This was more of a "Make a change or two and go to the races" type of thing. Then again, so was the anime ship I just mentioned. The American battlesub in that anime looked more like pulpy 40's tech. Man, this is gonna drive me nuts now...

 

EDIT: Super Atragon! That's what it was. Pics here: http://aswars.tripod.com/id91.html and here: http://www.animeworld.com/reviews/superatragon.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Battleship? Sub? Naw....BATTLESUB!!!

 

This is based on the idea of submersible battle cruisers. The idea was the "ship" would hide underwater, surface to do battle (typically against merchant ships) then dive, and disappear. Never really caught on, the torepedo is just too effective, and a sub on the surface is almost a sitting duck (little armor). So fleet subs appeared, larger subs than in WW1, fast on the surface, with very long range. US subs, Japanese, and the German U-boats to a great extent followed this idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Battleship? Sub? Naw....BATTLESUB!!!

 

Then of course there were the British K and M class submarines. The K's were very fast steam-driven boats, while the M Class mounted twelve-inch guns for anti-shipping work. (Classed as submarine monitors).

 

There's a lot of great technology in the 30's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Battleship? Sub? Naw....BATTLESUB!!!

 

I took the time to give it a quick read through and it will be very useful once I get up to about 1940 in the game. Among other things I'm running a lot of 4 SPD characters so they fit my game that way as well.

 

I'll probably happily take them and modify them a little then dump them in. Thanks it's a very good sourcebook, and very close to the kind of thing I'm doing. There's a lot of fun in pre-war Supers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...