Jump to content

The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor


Barton

Recommended Posts

Guest steamteck

Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor

 

Individual bits were ok. Most of the action sequences were fu but uninspired. Looking at the subject and the cast I should of really liked this film but....

I felt Brendan Fraiser was toned down to let the kid shine and he just didn't have the spark. Maria Bello was Ok until you remembered Rachel Weist then arg!. Most of the cast seemed horribly underutilized as the the exotic location. The whole movie in fact lacked the spark and personality that made the first Mummy one of my favorite movies ever.

Dragon Emperor is worth seeing .. once, if you're not expecting thee same level of film as the first or even the 2nd Mummy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest steamteck

Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor

 

Nothing but love for RW, but . . .

 

. . . it's a MUMMY movie! How irreplaceable could anyone be? :D

 

 

Pretty much completely if they're going to have the Character in it at all IMO.

Frankly if they had a different Evie they needed a different Rick also. Probably a different Jonathon also. None of the returning actors seemed to relate to her 1/10th as well as to Rachel Weiz and visa versa. The interpersonal magic was just not there and it seriously damaged a movie which already had some strong narrative weaknesses. As well as a very forgettable mummy performance ( sorry jet usually love you) compared to Arnold Vosloo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor

 

Despite the spectacular SFX, IMO the core of the first Mummy film is really the fun, interesting characters and their interactions. Almost all the supporting players had their own moments to shine, and even Imhotep had some tragic depth. The producers of the later films have shown increasing obsession with digital spectacle. I keep hoping against hope that filmmakers will remember past precedents demonstrating that "bigger/ louder/ flashier" does not equal "better" or "more popular." :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest steamteck

Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor

 

Despite the spectacular SFX' date=' IMO the core of the first [i']Mummy[/i] film is really the fun, interesting characters and their interactions. Almost all the supporting players had their own moments to shine, and even Imhotep had some tragic depth. The producers of the later films have shown increasing obsession with digital spectacle. I keep hoping against hope that filmmakers will remember past precedents demonstrating that "bigger/ louder/ flashier" does not equal "better" or "more popular." :rolleyes:

 

 

exactly! Perfectly put.The essence that has been lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor

 

Despite the spectacular SFX' date=' IMO the core of the first [i']Mummy[/i] film is really the fun, interesting characters and their interactions. Almost all the supporting players had their own moments to shine, and even Imhotep had some tragic depth. The producers of the later films have shown increasing obsession with digital spectacle. I keep hoping against hope that filmmakers will remember past precedents demonstrating that "bigger/ louder/ flashier" does not equal "better" or "more popular." :rolleyes:

 

Almost all sequelized popular fiction suffers from the people making the sequels struggling to grasp what made the original good, and failing utterly, miserably, to do so. Books about a certain female detective recently discussed come to mind as another example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest steamteck

Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor

 

Almost all sequelized popular fiction suffers from the people making the sequels struggling to grasp what made the original good' date=' and failing utterly, miserably, to do so. Books about a certain female detective recently discussed come to mind as another example.[/quote']

 

 

Nuts I can't rep you again yet! That really is a truth of recent times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...