Eodin Posted May 26, 2019 Report Share Posted May 26, 2019 Reading through Viking Combat techniques, one I came across some time ago was how they would "block" a weapon attack by binding/entangling it, and following up as a counterstrike with their own weapon. My original thinking was that you could abort to a weapon bind just like a block, and follow with a counterstrike if the bind was successful. But re-reading Hero Martial Arts 6th edition, you cannot abort to a Bind, since it assumes Bind is an active attack like a Strike. Should I just say the "Block" in the martial block is a temporary bind, like blocking an attack by grabbing the weapon and then letting it go, instead of trying to add an Abort element to Weapon Bind? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucius Posted May 26, 2019 Report Share Posted May 26, 2019 43 minutes ago, Eodin said: Reading through Viking Combat techniques, one I came across some time ago was how they would "block" a weapon attack by binding/entangling it, and following up as a counterstrike with their own weapon. My original thinking was that you could abort to a weapon bind just like a block, and follow with a counterstrike if the bind was successful. But re-reading Hero Martial Arts 6th edition, you cannot abort to a Bind, since it assumes Bind is an active attack like a Strike. Should I just say the "Block" in the martial block is a temporary bind, like blocking an attack by grabbing the weapon and then letting it go, instead of trying to add an Abort element to Weapon Bind? Yes. Lucius Alexander The palindromedary affirms at both ends Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killer Shrike Posted May 26, 2019 Report Share Posted May 26, 2019 another option is that a fighter could hold an action, then dex off when attacked to execute bind if successful. another another option is, you can house rule bind to be abortable. Toxxus 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theinfn8 Posted May 27, 2019 Report Share Posted May 27, 2019 Speaking from a HEMA perspective, if you're going for something more historically based, then I would suggest that the game is still correct. I would leave Bind as an active attack. This type of immobilization always takes place after weapons come into contact with eachother (be it sword, shield, hand, etc.) Such a weapon "bind" is more like applying a joint lock to an opponent's arm after they have thrown a punch. You still need to defend against the attack before moving to the lock itself. You can't abort to a Martial Grab or Joint Lock. I could argue there is a case for making a Parry, Block, or Dodge a pre-requisite to conducting the Bind... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndianaJoe3 Posted May 27, 2019 Report Share Posted May 27, 2019 Adding. "Must Follow Block" to a Bind maneuver seems reasonable. Killer Shrike 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxxus Posted May 29, 2019 Report Share Posted May 29, 2019 On 5/26/2019 at 11:08 PM, theinfn8 said: You can't abort to a Martial Grab or Joint Lock. Ah, this gives me nostalgia for the old write up for Paek Tu (spelling?) that allowed you to Abort to attack with a +4d6 spinning back kick. Overpowered as !@#$. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.