Jump to content

Beast

HERO Member
  • Posts

    3,145
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Beast

  1. Re: FTL vs. Lots of Megascale Movement

     

    differences I see in FTL vs Megascale

    FTL you go from point A to point B nothing can intercept you except a hand wave from the GM then you would need to drop to sublight flight and duke it out

    generally speaking all ships are going to be with in 1 or 2 level of each other and there is no crunchy goodness of who is faster or more maneuverable at that level

     

    Megascale has the crunchy goodness of defining speed and maneuver for a tactical game at what ever speed you wish to play at(silly,rediculus,ludacris,or even plaid)

    however all parties need to be at the same megascale range to do combat(generally speaking those that are faster choose to either engage in combat or flee it becomes their choice)

    megascale t-port can be blocked by a megascale force field that is hardened vs t-port

    engine thrust can be degraded by drains,suppresses & tranfers

    terrain in space can be used

    it is easier to define instant jump type engines that take time to recharge(10 ly jumps but it takes 1 hr to recharge)

     

    of course the cost is the pts it takes to do this over FTL

     

    for me I like the crunchiness of megascale over FTL but I'll build what ever the GM decides how their universe works

     

    my obsevations on various shows movement systems

    Star Trek (TOS)movement and travel could happen at either sublight or warp speeds

    Star Trek(NG,DS9,VOY,&all movies)travel at warp fight at sublight

    Babylon 5 fight at sublight,travel ftl in an other diamension(combat is mentioned but avoided as being too dangerous to all sides but a shadow ship did wax a starfury in hyperspace with no ill effects to it self so there may be a tech thing)

    SG1 Jump gates instant move between 2 known and set up points however size is limited

    ships move at warp but seem to fight at sublight

    Star cruiser Yamato/BSG fight at sublight folding space is a jump with a recharge time

  2. Re: Tac-nukes vs. Nuclear Warheads

     

    why does it have to be a sphere when a cone or cylinder is the shape of most bullets

     

    also an nuke going off as a skin to skin will do a good job unless you need a deep penatration

     

     

    Well, I was going from memory... I suppose a 35mm or 40mm gun could be used...

     

    The reason I want the very high velocity of a discarding sabot round is that the shooter should not want to be anywhere near these, and it would make long range targetting easier.

     

     

    I wonder if there would be a practical way to make an armor piercing version of that round. I would think that if you mounted the "payload" in the tail section of a long rod penetrator, it probably would not go off on its own. If you mount it in the front, it would go off on the surface, and the penetrator would probably do nothing practical.

     

    Maybe if you put it closer to the middle of a projectile you could make it so that enough mass moves forward to compress it and trigger the reaction.

     

    As to the 18 day half life, well, if these are not "general issue" rounds, perhaps you just manufacture them, then transport them via supersonic transport to the area of operations, and deploy them as fast as possible.

     

    Rotate shells every 10-15 days?

     

    Imagine how effective such a warhead would be on an agile sidewinder type missile.

     

    peace through superior firepower?

  3. Re: PAH - KV Virus - Infected designing

     

    just to add some more thoughts to what I gave earlier here

     

    the infected but sane are those that have been cured by Dr Neville's formula

    but the high fever has burned out/ereased most skills(those that directly concern survival would be retained)

    so starting characters could not have any skills other than climbing,breakfall,acrobatics,survival,stealth,tracking...

    no martial arts

    they could learn new skills

    might extend the time it takes to have UV light harm them

     

    the insane infected from the movie did copy the trap Neville made so there is some reasoning they can do(maybe 1 cramming slot)

    also they attacked in waves at Nevilles house instead of all of them getting blown to bits(probing his defences)

     

    it took the 1 hanging from the ceiling at least 10 seconds to beat/tear a hole in the roof so no need for a killing attack he just could only use maybe 20 to 25 str while hanging to make the hole

    he had only drywall, 2x4's and 3/8" bracing to get through

    call it 2 def 6 body

     

    since the infection has already happened to those that survived I see no need for buting an immunity

     

    normal humans need to take normal human charactistic maxima

    for the sane but infected

    I would raise str,con,dex,pre to 25 or 30

    spd 5

    lower com and int to 5(while they are inteligent something needs to make them other than just better humans for me they are more physically adept)

    light sleep

    Ir vision

    DF looks could be mistaken for 1 of the insane infected

    suscepabilitiy to sunlight/high uv light 1d6 a phase does body

    susceptability to sunlight/high uv light flash 1d6 per phase

     

    for the insane infected

    maxima for str,con.dex,pre 35 to 40

    spd 6

    int and com stay the same

    psy lim must feed on the uninfected

    berserk in combat

    berserk when uninfected are seen

    suscepabilitiy to sunlight/high uv light 1d6 a phase does body

    susceptability to sunlight/high uv light flash 1d6 per phase

    damage reduction 75%vs pd non resistant act 15> or head shot

    clinging

    there leaping would be increased by there str nothing in the movie would have had them needing more than 8" with a 40 str

    with the increased spd and going non combat gets them to their targets faster

  4. Re: Rail gun damage?

     

    Tanks have almost no place in them that does not have something vital when going thru 1 side then out the other

    now something like a 2000 ton WW2 destroyer having 8"+ sized AP rounds passing thru a DD and doing next to nothing for damage is more what I'm talking about and did happen because they had next to no armor on them

    but when hit with an HE round major damge was caused

    look at the space shuttle most of the vital compnets are either at the bow or stern of this space craft

    there is lots of space in the middle that a shot went thru the shuttle it would not harm it except when it tried to land without repairs

     

    while an A-10 straffing a DD might damage some systems on the ship and kill/wound some people

    it would not destroy it unless it got a round into the magazine and detonated the ammo in there

    Oddly enough, at the velocities being discussed for railgun / coilgun projectiles, the novel effects of impact make a dumb, solid slug more than sufficient to cause a lot of damage. Metal behaves like liquid at those energy levels, and "splashes" at the impact point, flowing out of the way of the projectile.

     

    Even now, the GAU-8 cannon on the A-10 will often put the API rounds clean through some tanks, in one side and out the other. And yet somehow, that still manages to do a lot of damage to the tank. Huh.

  5. Re: PAH - KV Virus - Infected designing

     

    since the infection has already happened to those that survived I see no need for buting an immunity

     

    normal humans need to take normal human charactistic maxima

    for the sane but infected

    I would raise str,con,dex,pre to 25 or 30

    spd 5

    lower com and int to 5(while they are inteligent something needs to make them other than just better humans for me they are more physically adept)

    light sleep

    Ir vision

    DF looks could be mistaken for 1 of the insane infected

    suscepabilitiy to sunlight/high uv light 1d6 a phase does body

    susceptability to sunlight/high uv light flash 1d6 per phase

     

    for the insane infected

    maxima for str,con.dex,pre 35 to 40

    spd 6

    int and com stay the same

    psy lim must feed on the uninfected

    berserk in combat

    berserk when uninfected are seen

    suscepabilitiy to sunlight/high uv light 1d6 a phase does body

    susceptability to sunlight/high uv light flash 1d6 per phase

    damage reduction 75%vs pd non resistant act 15> or head shot

    clinging

    there leaping would be increased by there str nothing in the movie would have had them needing more than 8" with a 40 str

    with the increased spd and going non combat gets them to their targets faster

     

    Hey TH...read it dude and help me out!!!:hail:

     

    Ok to continue on with what I would like to design:

     

     

     

     

    Ok as I stated I want to state that 90% of humanity will just catch the

    KV Virus and die outright! Then 2% of humanity will be Immune to the

    virus and can never be infected even from a bite. All players will be

    members of this oh so lucky few!

     

    Next for those that fell ill with the KV Virus but survived it two groups

    immerged:

     

    MUTANTS: these humans fell ill with the KV Virus but managed to survive

    it's affect, but their genetically altered.

     

    - loss of all body hair

    - skin has become thicker but rubbery(some power here)

    - slight increase to their STR

    - slight increase to their DEX

    - hyperaware /lightsleeper

    - retain their humanity and higher brain functions

    - Ultraviolet and Light sensative with blindness for eyes - disadvantage

    - Ultraviolet light is painful if exposed directly to skin - disadvantage

    - slight ability to see within darkness

     

    NIGHT WALKERS (Invected): these humans fell ill with the KV Virus and

    although they survived it, they were greatly genetically alterred

    and lost their humanity. They became flesh eating monsters.

     

    - loss of all body hair

    - skin has become thicker but rubbery(some power here)

    skin grants some damage resistance or etc

    - great increase to their STR

    - great increase to their DEX

    - greatly increased SPD

    - Flying Dodge

    - Leaping ability, running on all fours

    - Hyperaware /lightsleeper /telscopic smell

    - beserker - loss of their humanity/ pack nature

    - harden nails and sharpen enlarged teeth - weapons

    - abilty to climb and cling to things well

    - screaming sounds used to communication and cause fear in others

    - Severe Ultraviolet and Light sensative with blindness for eyes -

    disadvantage

    - Severe Ultraviolet light is painful if exposed directly to skin

    and they take burning damage - disadvantage

    - See in the dark as normal as humans see in daylight

    - Carrier of the KV Virus, and their bite can infect animals that

    would not normally be infected by the Airbourne Virsus

     

     

     

     

    Thus is what I would like to have designed into TWO packages for

    the infected of KV Virus : Mutant Package, Night Walker Package!

     

    I need the aid of this collective body please!!!:hail:

     

    Penn

  6. Re: Tac-nukes vs. Nuclear Warheads

     

    why not use what the military uses in theory to have secure comms with various systems

    Global Hawk and Predator direct their comms away from the enemy instead of using omidirectional antennas towards satalites in space

    also incoming commands can only be heard because the antenna only looks at a small patch of sky so jamming is a moot thing

     

    I think you have not thought things out fully. If the hull does not radiate any heat' date=' this means that any heat generated inside the hull will stay inside the hull. This includes waste heat from the power plant, drive, and the body heat of all the crew members [i'](if you have been stuck in a closed room with too many people you know what I mean)[/i].

     

    So the temperature will eventually rise to a point where the bulkheads will start glowing, all flammable objects will catch fire, and the people will die agonizing deaths. ;)

  7. Re: Rail gun damage?

     

    there was a movie based on Dr. Gerald Bull who built the longest ranged cannon(500 mile range from Iraq to Israel and the gun needed to be in the middle of Iraq

    for defence purposes

    with the velocities needed to get the projectile to the target the barrel was coated with a really slick polymer that could be repainted on the inside of the barrel after every shot

    what about a simular solution painting on a conductor that ablates away and carries the heat away with it

     

    the movie was the Doomsday gun with Frank Langella

    netfix link

     

    http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Doomsday_Gun/70036913?trkid=147042

     

    Would it be possible to repair the rails somehow? And if not' date=' would they still be useful in some way, perhaps be recycled for other uses?[/quote']
  8. Re: Rail gun damage?

     

    the purpose of a KE weapon is to impart that KE into the target

    if the weapon over penatrates the target without destroying or disabling it

    then you need to see what can be done to projectile to either slow it down while inside the target

    possible solutions

    1) delayed fusing Turn the pojectile in to shrapnel while inside the target

    once past the main defences the insides are usually soft

    defence armored compartments

    2)control the speed of the projectile fire it just fast enough to penatrate the main defence so that it bounces around after hitting the defences on the other side of the target

    defence have minimal passive defences and a huge amount of volume and redundant systems

    I'm sure there are other things that can be don to the projectile

     

    Or rocket-propelled chainsaws :D

     

    You're right, though. Overheating is the major problem right now with railgun design. You're pumping a huge current through something that isn't perfectly conductive - you're going to get induction heating (hence the earlier interest in superconductors). The current problem with the railguns being developed is that they are good for one or two shots: the rapid heating and reaction force of tossing a projectile heats and warps them so much that they need the "rails" replacing after every shot

     

     

     

    There's also the limitations that most of the mass of the shell today for high velocity weapons is propellant, which introduces supply issues and the fact that there is an ultimate limit (speed of expansion of the gas) which sets an upper limit to energy transfer. In theory, the upper limit of railguns is much higher than that

     

     

     

    Agreed. Against soft targets, there's no guarantee that railguns would actually do much - if any - more damage than conventional projectiles - if it makes a hole through you, it makes a hole through you. It's primarily the size of the hole that matters, not the speed at which it's made. Against hardened targets, more velocity means higher kinetic energy, so as long as you have a projectile that can efficiently transfer that energy, you should get better penetration. But there's no real reason it'd do more damage.

     

    The real advantage of a railgun in space is the same as in real life - it gets your damage to the target faster, so they have less time to evade, and if you have the power to run it, you can carry more ammo for the same amount of weight.

     

    cheers, Mark

  9. Re: Hypothetically and unofficially, what would you like to see in a Mecha Hero book?

     

    what I'd like to see

    both low and hi mecha genres

    also giving discussion on how to fit in various other genres(PA,Supers,Cyberpunk,Steampunk,Star hero,Galactiic hero.....)

    also size considerations

    effects of having a high PSI with such a small footprint compared to other vehicles on anything other than being on an jumbo jet runway

  10. Re: Tac-nukes vs. Nuclear Warheads

     

    there is a picture of test baker which was a subsurface blast

    she was intact after both blasts but sank due to leakage 5 days later from the underwater blast

    had the crew survived they might have kept her afloat

     

    links

    http://www.maritimequest.com/warship_directory/japan/battleships/nagato_page_1.htm

    bottom of the page is a picture of her after being nuked

     

    test Baker

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Crossroads#Sunk_during_test_Baker.2C_25_July_1946

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Crossroads_baker_explosion.jpg

     

    some where I heard of 1 of the pictures of test baker you can see 1/2 a ship sticking out of the dome of water/steam that is suppose to be Nagato

    the dome is 6000' high so that would put Nagato about 2500' in the air or there abouts

     

     

     

    Battleships probably didn't sink only because they were atop ground zero, wich was placed below water surface.

     

    And for space, the difference in speed of radiation propagation isn't really relevant in a macroscopic scale, because it is still very near the speed of light, even in the atmosphere. But the heat generated would probably be more important in space as no energy would be "wasted" in generating the blast effect. If I were a GM having to take a decision on this, I would say that a nuke in space would probably do roughly the same amout of damages than an atmospheric, underground or underwater nuclear explosion.

  11. Re: Laser Gunship Revealed

     

    it would also depend on how fast and hot the air got along the beam path

     

    if we are talking about melting a hole thru a tank you would see the air go incandesant

    if we are talking about disabling optics blinding/3rd degree burns to flesh probably not

  12. Re: SFX Question... What's in those blaster clips?

     

    are the clips rechargable?ala a laser power pack

    they could contain a chemical energy source(high output very short duration to power the particle accelerator in the gun)shaped like smaller shells(to get a more shots that a regular gun)

    the big thing is who many shots are there in a clip?

    are all the components in the weapon and it just needs power(I have unlimited ammo but only as long a stay plugged in)

     

    I'd have to say for a near future game clips hold shells that contain a chemical power source and the particles for the accerator

    the shell carries away the excess heat

    there is no potential energy(standing in a battery)

  13. Re: Weapon From Anything???

     

    why not have the mulitpower

    with the added limitation of no conscience control

    and have the Game master decide how much damage an item can cause

    and unless the object has something vital to the game(laptop has the codes to disarm the nukes)I wouldn't worry about it

    as a matter of fact I would that as a delima for the hero

    use the laptop as a weapon or go naked into the next fight

  14. Re: Defunct Comic Publishers and Licenced Sourcebooks

     

    there are factors that could explain the problem

    1 pizza shop was run by sombody that had no business sence

    2 crappy service

    3 too many pizza joints in the area

    4 nobody in the area likes pizza

    5 ran out of the special sauce/lost the secret recipe(ran out of cool ideas/story lines)

     

    look at Buffy the vampire slayer

    movie sucked

    TV show rawked

     

    the character concepts might be cool,but the way they where presented or where the story took them killed the book

     

    Erm... perhaps I'm just dense. But if a property couldn't thrive in the (much larger) world of comic-book fandom, why would it thrive in the (much smaller) world of RPG fandom? In other words, if the comic book failed, wouldn't RPG material based on the comic also be likely to fail?

     

    It sorta reminds me of when I see someone open a pizza joint in the same location where another pizza joint just went out of business. If that location already drove one pizza joint under, why on earth would you risk your money opening another pizza joint there? :confused::)

  15. Re: Surviving fall from orbit

     

    thanks

     

    shouldn't that be 11 kps(kilometers per second)

     

    assuming typical PC toughness - solid iron - and a mininum orbital velocity - 11kph - at least you get a crater, and the impactor remains mostly intact.

     

    Transient Crater Diameter: 32.1 m = 105 ft

    Transient Crater Depth: 11.4 m = 37.3 ft

     

    Final Crater Diameter: 40.2 m = 132 ft

    Final Crater Depth: 8.56 m = 28.1 ft

     

    The crater formed is a simple crater

     

    The floor of the crater is underlain by a lens of broken rock debris (breccia) with a maximum thickness of 3.97 m = 13 ft.

    At this impact velocity ( < 12 km/s), little shock melting of the target occurs.

     

    There won't even be a fireball, and even a mere 100 metres from the crater you'll barely feel the seismic shockwave.

     

    Admittedly, the civilians on the block you just reduced to a Simple Crater will be very unhappy....

  16. Re: Surviving fall from orbit

     

    Dry Ice(CO2 in solid form)is about -10 deg F

    which is just a little colder than 0 deg C

    you might be thinking of liquid nitrogen which I think is in that area

    saw a teacher dip a banana in it and then used it as a hammer

     

    angle of attackfor entering the atmosphere is what needs to be defined

    the closer to 90 degrees the shorter time till you hit ground less time to heat up from friction

     

    now what will be the explosion from a mass of 100kg hitting the ground at near orbital velocities

     

    I don't think you would worry about 'the bends' in the case. Becuase it is the result of moving from high preasure, where Nitrogen and other gases compress into your body, to areas of low preasure to quickly. Cuasing the aformentioned Nitrogen to rapidly reform into its gas state and, essentially 'boil' out.

     

    And as a side note to the minus 70 degrees C survival idea. If you want to know what it would be like to survive that temp, here is how to simulate it. Fill your fridge full of Dry Ice till it adjust temp and stand in there(w/ some form of air supply, otherwise you will suffocate). Dry ice is about -80C. If you can still feel your toes and fingers after 10minutes, you might be able to survive the atmospheric temp.

     

    La Rose

  17. Re: Terran Empire Starships: Game Play

     

    kinda like peeling an onion

    if we all work on it and do it quick

    there will be only a little crying

     

    my tactics for a fleet battle would be

    ftr's keep ftrs busy or take out bomber types or act as missle defence

    use bomber types as missle defence till enemy ftrs are gone

    corvettes and DD's on anti fighter/anti-missle defence

    cruisers pair or triple up on enemy DD's and smaller

    all the rest single out the biggest ship in range and kill it

    use ftrs and bombers to take out the rest starting with small to large

     

    Ya know beast, I didn't think of that. The high Def/Shield ratings on those ships would lead to the "Everyone concentrate fire on that super stardestroyer" type scenarios.

     

    However it does make fighters pretty much useless against the capital ships because there wouldn't be any way for them to punch through the defenses.

     

    Unless, again, you have one or two other capital ships take down on of the shields and then the fighters dart in and lay about with the carpet bombing.

  18. Re: Terran Empire Starships: Game Play

     

    this would be where BB's pound on DD's

    or all ships coordinate on 1 ship to cripple it(take down 1 shield)

    large volleys of missles at the lead ship(or a ship that might be outside of an anti missle envelope)

     

    I haven't every used any of the Star Hero ships. I looked at the amount of damage the weapons can do compared to the defenses and pretty much figured that only a maximum damage hit even had a hope to penetrate the defenses and score some damage.

     

    Now, the defenses of the ships, if I remember correctly, are layered so sometimes you might get the full defensive value and sometimes you might not. But still, like was pointed out, it would be a long drawn out affair that would be boring as heck.

     

    The fighters are just as bad as the capital class starships. However, I did come across an optional rule that *might* tip the scales a bit. You have the option of comparing the Size values and using that as extra body added to the damage roll. So if you have a fighter that is size 4 against a Cap ship size 14, when the cap ship hits the fighter you can add 10 Body to whatever you roll.

     

    That works well for Cap ship vs fighter but Cap ship vs Cap ship is still going to be just pounding away on each others shields.

     

    The space combats I have done have been with custom made craft who's defenses and armament ratings are no where close to what the TE/AW ships are.

     

    Hopefully there was a point to all that . . if not thanks for at least reading through it. :P

  19. Re: Heroes and Nukes!

     

    you can mission kill that tank by removing the turret

    it is not bolted down and may only weigh about 25 tons(50 str brick)

    or turtle it(on it's side or top 60 tons (56 str)

     

    Does Grond then get a STR boost so he can cave in the frontal armor with a pushed haymaker? I already thought that increasing the M1's armor to 30 DEF in a supers game was excessive.

     

    I think that, when there's a scaling clash in a supers game between supers, heavy weapons, and armored vehicles, the clash should be resolved in favor of the supers being better able to withstand the heavy weaponry and damage the armored vehicles.

    Unless the aim of the campaign is to have fragile, wimpy bricks who flee in terror at the sight of a LAW, or sigh in frustration when they can't break through the top armor of a tank.;)

  20. Re: The Big Chill

     

    problems with building the Habbakuk

    1) had to start with a work in below freezing area

    2)those to serve on board had to live in below freezing temps(there might have been some thermally shielded rooms galleies,sleeping quarters,etc)

    3) the thing would have dwarfed a modern CVN(I believe it was suppose to be able to handle medium bombers(b-25,b-26,mosquitoes)

    4)the hull was to be arould 30' to 50' thick but it would have been really slow (10kts max)

×
×
  • Create New...