bigdamnhero Posted September 14, 2017 Report Share Posted September 14, 2017 I mentioned this in another thread, but thought I'd put it here for all to see. For those of you who loved the Rifts setting but couldn't stand the wildly-unbalanced mechanics, Hero alum Sean Fannon has republished Rifts for the Savage Worlds system. Wired has a good review: https://www.wired.com/2017/05/geeks-guide-rifts/ I haven't picked up the book(s) myself yet (lack of funds), but I got to play a game at a convention a few months ago and it was a hoot. And I've heard several people say it captures the feel of the original Rifts but with a smooth, playable system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDU Neil Posted October 5, 2017 Report Share Posted October 5, 2017 Quick question about Savage Worlds. I haven't played it in years, but it didn't scale very well. A system built for pulp style action adventure really didn't work well for Supers, even though I loved the Necessary Evil concept. For example: PCs vs. a tank. Yes, it would be a major deal for a party of typical SW adventurers to take on an alien war tank, when you have a team of supposedly powerful supervillains who can't even damage the tank due to "logical" armor levels, that was really frustrating. Essentially, to have characters powerful enough to hurt a tank that was scaled to be "realistic" vs. typical SW characters, the PCs would be brokenly powerful to anything else. The reason I ask, is that Rifts has the "anything and everything" concept that is basically what a supers world is like... so how does it scale, say, one person playing a cowboy and someone else playing a power-armored space soldier, and a third playing Thor? That kind of thing seemed to break SW in my experience. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdamnhero Posted October 6, 2017 Author Report Share Posted October 6, 2017 I only played the one short game, so I can't really say. I do agree that SW suffers from scale problems on the high end generally. (Tho in NE remember the tanks were supposed to be super-advanced alien tanks that had already killed off all of Earth's superheroes, so they weren't exactly meant to be mooks.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndianaJoe3 Posted October 6, 2017 Report Share Posted October 6, 2017 The reason I ask, is that Rifts has the "anything and everything" concept that is basically what a supers world is like... so how does it scale, say, one person playing a cowboy and someone else playing a power-armored space soldier, and a third playing Thor? That kind of thing seemed to break SW in my experience. To be fair, having characters of vastly differing power levels will give any simulationist system (including Hero) problems. Dramatic systems (Such as Fate) handle those situations better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Certified Posted October 7, 2017 Report Share Posted October 7, 2017 I think you can find play test videos on YouTube. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdamnhero Posted October 8, 2017 Author Report Share Posted October 8, 2017 To be fair, having characters of vastly differing power levels will give any simulationist system (including Hero) problems. Dramatic systems (Such as Fate) handle those situations better. As I understood it, I think RDU Neil's question was less about party balance and more about can the system handle both low-level and high-level powered characters. There aren't really that many game systems that scale well at those extremes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zslane Posted October 8, 2017 Report Share Posted October 8, 2017 There aren't really that many game systems that scale well at those extremes. Yeah, no kidding. Outside of superhero RPGs it is nearly unheard of for a game system to scale up to cosmic-level extremes and still work. And not all superhero RPGs do it well, even. On the other hand, the price you usually pay for smooth scaling to such high power levels is a lack of granularity at the lower power levels, but for a game like Rifts I don't think that's of much concern. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbywolfe Posted October 12, 2017 Report Share Posted October 12, 2017 Quick question about Savage Worlds. I haven't played it in years, but it didn't scale very well. A system built for pulp style action adventure really didn't work well for Supers, even though I loved the Necessary Evil concept. For example: PCs vs. a tank. Yes, it would be a major deal for a party of typical SW adventurers to take on an alien war tank, when you have a team of supposedly powerful supervillains who can't even damage the tank due to "logical" armor levels, that was really frustrating. Essentially, to have characters powerful enough to hurt a tank that was scaled to be "realistic" vs. typical SW characters, the PCs would be brokenly powerful to anything else. The reason I ask, is that Rifts has the "anything and everything" concept that is basically what a supers world is like... so how does it scale, say, one person playing a cowboy and someone else playing a power-armored space soldier, and a third playing Thor? That kind of thing seemed to break SW in my experience. Superheroes is one of the few genres I don't particularly like with Savage Worlds. That being said, the issue you bring up sounds more like a setting issue than a game system issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weldun Posted January 20, 2018 Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 On 10/6/2017 at 2:12 AM, RDU Neil said: Quick question about Savage Worlds. I haven't played it in years, but it didn't scale very well. A system built for pulp style action adventure really didn't work well for Supers, even though I loved the Necessary Evil concept. For example: PCs vs. a tank. Yes, it would be a major deal for a party of typical SW adventurers to take on an alien war tank, when you have a team of supposedly powerful supervillains who can't even damage the tank due to "logical" armor levels, that was really frustrating. Essentially, to have characters powerful enough to hurt a tank that was scaled to be "realistic" vs. typical SW characters, the PCs would be brokenly powerful to anything else. The reason I ask, is that Rifts has the "anything and everything" concept that is basically what a supers world is like... so how does it scale, say, one person playing a cowboy and someone else playing a power-armored space soldier, and a third playing Thor? That kind of thing seemed to break SW in my experience. Having played it for a bit, I'm liking the way it handled things. It avoids the problem with base Savage Worlds characters being so one-note that they don't rate a whole two dimensions by adding iconic frameworks. Mega-Damage is just the heavy mechanic renamed with a lot of the lighter weaponry no longer counting, but interestingly this means that the idea that a few towns and settlements actually successfully survive a demon attack is believable. Many of the personal armor now use a toughness mechanic so that they always help protect regardless of the AP value. Spellcasters and Psychic need to ration themselves a bit, but that stops them from just outshining everyone else. The Glitterboy lays the smack down, but has a BIG note saying that it should also attract much of the oppositions fire. Mercs and Adventurers get a boost by being veteran characters (with the +20xp) and some extra items. All in all, it's a more fun and fast-flowing game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.