Gemphyre Posted September 4, 2008 Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 Here is a question for the rules gurus. I understand that Mental Illusions, Mind Control, Telepathy, Mind Scan, and attacks bought with BOECV only work against the defined class of mind for the power(s), and that is not a problem. I understand the reasons for this, and this question has nothing to do with these powers. However, is an Ego Attack limited in the same manner, assuming that the target has an Ego and Stun to start with. For example, assuming there is no added Classes of Minds to the power, would an Ego Attack that works against Joe Blow work just as well against a Grizzly Bear? I can see arguments for both sides of this question. Gemphyre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyper-Man Posted September 4, 2008 Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 Re: Are Ego Attacks limited in the same manner as other EGO powers? from 5er page 117 CLASSES OF MINDS At their base level, all Mental Powers (including Ego Attack) affect only one class of minds. The basic classes include Human, Animal, Machine, and Alien; the GM can add other classes or alter these as he sees fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemphyre Posted September 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 Re: Are Ego Attacks limited in the same manner as other EGO powers? from 5er page 117 And, of course, I do not have the revised edition, only the original 5th edition. Now that I know what to look for, I can probably find it myself. OK. Now a related question. From CKC, would you classify The Monster as "Human" or "Alien"? Came up in a game that I was GMing last weekend. (He got away, and the group was not foolish enough to follow him into the sewers.) Gemphyre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Hiemforth Posted September 4, 2008 Report Share Posted September 4, 2008 Re: Are Ego Attacks limited in the same manner as other EGO powers? From CKC' date=' would you classify The Monster as "Human" or "Alien"?[/quote']It all depends on how you want to fill in the blanks in The Monster's mysterious origins. It could be any class of mind, depending on what you decide it really is. Personally, I'd put The Monster under Alien class of minds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Re: Are Ego Attacks limited in the same manner as other EGO powers? One other point relevant to this discussion from the FAQ: Are powers with the BOECV Advantage subject to the “classes of minds” rules that apply to Mental Powers? No. As noted in the BOECV text, BOECV powers aren’t actually Mental Powers per se. However, in some psionics-oriented campaigns, the GM may choose to have the classes of minds rules affect BOECV powers in the interest of fairness and consistency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagadorn Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Re: Are Ego Attacks limited in the same manner as other EGO powers? I Made the monster immune to ego attacks with a Ego Damage shield Vs mind links. (For other purposes he counts as a demon) But in my capmpaign the monster is alot nastier then he's meant to be. A question from me. I wanna buy an entangle with BOECV. Just how does that work? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoreBrute Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Re: Are Ego Attacks limited in the same manner as other EGO powers? It would be like an illusion in a man's mind, that causes him to be trapped in it. No one can help him physically, and his mind will not let him leave his entangled area. He might not even be able to teleport. Ego Attacks would do damage to this entangle though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted September 6, 2008 Report Share Posted September 6, 2008 Re: Are Ego Attacks limited in the same manner as other EGO powers? And' date=' of course, I do not have the revised edition, only the original 5th edition. Now that I know what to look for, I can probably find it myself.[/quote'] That passage of the rules is on p. 79 of the original Fifth Edition. Our board colleague zornwil generously tabulated the page correspondences between original Fifth Edition and 5E Revised, and posted them to the forums, here. For ease of reference I copied all his data onto a Document file, which I'll Attach below. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.