Re: Code VS Killing Poll
#5 isn't really an option for me if I'm thinking of the character as a "Superhero", regardless of setting.
#3 & 4 are my usual "settings" for supers, though I don't always take the disad for someone I'm playing as #3, and even someone who's clearly #4 would consider ALL other options before making the decision to kill.
#1 & 2 are, to my mind, very campaign/setting-specific: if it's absolutely clear at the beginning that that's the type of campaign the character's in, that's what I play.
Question for the "Heroes NEVER Kill" camp: What happens when a villain with a known murderous streak threatens an innocent with certain and instantaneous death, unless you comply with "X" immediately? Hint: Hitting said villain with your stongest attack and HOPING or ASSUMING he'll survive is, IMHO, the same as choosing to kill. Let's also assume for the moment that you can't entangle the villain, put some kind of defense on the impending victim, or teleport either target. Basically, you can't just negate the threat, you have to use a damaging attack.
I'm not looking for an answer that depends on individual character-design aesthetics ("I always design my characters with 'X' ability").
NOT wanting to start an argument here, just curious.
John T