Re: Divide by Three
You are intentionally choosing one of the most undercosted (for fantasy) powers for your example, so it carries no weight. Except for force field and flight, 45 AP is pretty balanced across all the powers.
(As an aside, in FH, wizards are a lot better off investing in non-attack powers. Attacks are expensive, whereas support powers like invisibility or telekinesis are not only powerful in their own right, most opponents have no answer for them--unless magic is extremely widespread in the setting.)
Precisely. The point is whether the wide range should be discouraged. In my opinion, it should, because I have seen too many munchkins spend 20 real points on an RKA and five more on a 0 END force field, and then play their 'wizards' as if they were Cyclops of the X-Men. Far less irritating are wizards with 8-10 mostly-noncombat spells in the 20-30 AP range.