CBikle

Re: House Rule Question: STUN From Impotent KA's I think the focus of the original rule (no body=half-stun) was geared towards our stun rolls vs. VIP NPCs. Basically, the GM doesn't want to see the master-villain with 30/30 defenses, getting clocked by a lucky roll that does 120 stun. I think the fact that the rule benefits you and SunStrike was an unintentional side-effect.

Re: House Rule Question: STUN From Impotent KA's

Re: House Rule Question: STUN From Impotent KA's Just realized that the proposed rule would make Force Fields much more powerful. For a base of 30 pts. , you can create a 15 PD/ED FF that will prevent the average body damage from a 4d6 RKA. For 37 pts. you can make it completely hardened.

Re: How should a Super-Power Suppression Field affect characteristics? Tough call, but I'd also rule that Batman is unaffected. Personally I'm not a fan of the "super-power drain trap". I know it happens in the comics, but it'll just annoy players and wide-scale adjustment powers just overly complicate the game anyways.

Re: How should a Super-Power Suppression Field affect characteristics? I'd probably rule that any "super stats" would reduce to the characteristic max. Just seems like the fairest way to do something like that.

Re: House Rule Question: STUN From Impotent KA's

Re: House Rule Question: STUN From Impotent KA's I should mention that I'm in this game. The players in favor of the house rule are OK with really high stun totals (stun lotto), but only if the attack actually does body. My counter-proposal was a flat X3 stun mult, which would reduce chances of the stun lotto, but some of the players don't feel that the rule is balanced and/or accurately reflect how some super-heroes are seemingly immune to small and heavy weapons fire (ie: taking little or no stun) that doesn't appear to "do body". Personally, I think that's more of a reflection of really high defenses, Con, Damage reduction, etc. I don't think a house rule is necessary to reflect this. I like Lord Liaden's house rule, which when you think about it, is kind of a reverse-version of the Reduced Penetration limit.

Re: New Player freaks the heck out of me.

Re: I am hot!

Re: I am hot! OOOOOOHHHH!!!! I'M GOING TO WRITE YOU SUCH A NASTY PM !!!!! :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

Re: I am hot! If you need any tips on cyber-stalking, just holla.

Re: I am hot!

Re: Campaign Styles In our game we've done this largely to handle in-between game investigation and role-playing. Also for adventure prologues and setting up the plot hook. Saves a lot of time by allowing you to take care of the more mundane details OOG that normally eat up actual game time.

Re: Character name help!!! I even created a logo.

Re: Character name help!!! BRAIN-FIST !!!

Re: Character name help!!! Brain-Fist.

Re: Space Hotel "Silence, you tin-plated ninny !"

Re: A Mentalist who takes it for the team part 2 This all seems ok , albeit a little underpowered for most games. I like the idea, but a lot of GMs might have reservations about how the extra SPD and DCV might affect game-balance. But this guy sounds like an NPC so, it's not as much of a concern . Also, the Lightning Reflexes and Speed buffs means that the Speed Chart will be MUCH more complicated than usual.

Re: Space Hotel So long as they don't make the same mistake that the crew of the Jupiter 2 made by bringing this guy along...

Re: character design help, please (long) I agree with Assface. Hi Assface !!!

Re: "Tesla Magnetic Bomb" I actually used Nikola Tesla as a super-villain in a Champs game awhile back.

Re: CBikle Stop writing me That's not an unreasonable suggestion and I think this thread is dying down (although part of me thinks it would be hilarious if it went 20+pages). Technically, I have a right to be annoyed about someone starting a thread with the intent of making me look like a cyber-stalker, but really I just find the whole thing funny (and maybe a little sad). I think every time the thread is on the verge of dying off, it gets re-energized by someone taking it too seriously.

Re: CBikle Stop writing me Eh. I grow more and more convinced that this was another (or the same ?) fake.

Re: CBikle Stop writing me

Re: CBikle Stop writing me For those that are interested, here's the transcripts: The Subject header of the PM was "Sorry If You Were Offended" CBikle Jun 20th: Awhile back there was a (male) poster who pretended to be, not one, but two hot lesbians. His speech pattern was/is almost identical to yours... I'm still skeptical, but in any case, it wasn't my intent to hurt your feelings or otherwise chase you off the boards. Welcome to the Hero Boards and have fun. Siren Jun 30th: No thank you. This is not the type of board or people I am used to being with. I truely doubt I will be back in any way. If you read it, my Post was for a Hot Superhero, not me. I even said I would meet Ghost-Angel at a con. This board of full of negative energy and something I do not with to be part of. BTW I saw your lame appology in topic. Please do not write me again. CBikle July, 6: Well, whatever, I tried. That was the extent of our "correspondence". Not exactly the Jefferson papers, but hardly cyber-stalking either.