SCUBA Hero Posted March 17, 2022 Report Share Posted March 17, 2022 Saw some articles indicating that the US is supplying Switchblade kamikaze drones to Ukraine: AeroVironment Switchblade - Wikipedia The 300 has a warhead equivalent to a 40mm grenade. The 600 has an anti-tank warhead comparable to a Javelin ATGM. So throw those values in, write up a vehicle with the stated speed/range characteristics and guidance systems, maybe up the DCV to represent how difficult it is to intercept, and you've got a HERO System writeup! 😃 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archer Posted March 17, 2022 Report Share Posted March 17, 2022 That's a pretty neat technology. But I'd be hesitant to introduce airbursting 40mm grenades guided from 6 kilometers away to make sure they ignore cover. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grailknight Posted March 18, 2022 Report Share Posted March 18, 2022 I wouldn't use a vehicle for a suicide drone. I'd make it an attack with extended range and indirect and appropriate Limitations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCUBA Hero Posted March 18, 2022 Author Report Share Posted March 18, 2022 That works too. But it's definitely not a half-Phase attack, at least at longer ranges (98/115mph = 44/51 meters per Segment), it's remotely controlled, and there's a physical structure that can be damaged or destroyed. Once you add Limitations to reflect those things, IMO it's easier to do a vehicle write-up. But that's just my preference. Scott Ruggels 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Ruggels Posted March 19, 2022 Report Share Posted March 19, 2022 In the least it’s a focus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grailknight Posted March 19, 2022 Report Share Posted March 19, 2022 22 hours ago, SCUBA Hero said: That works too. But it's definitely not a half-Phase attack, at least at longer ranges (98/115mph = 44/51 meters per Segment), it's remotely controlled, and there's a physical structure that can be damaged or destroyed. Once you add Limitations to reflect those things, IMO it's easier to do a vehicle write-up. But that's just my preference. Vehicles are something you expect to use multiple times though. These are just attacks . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundog Posted March 21, 2022 Report Share Posted March 21, 2022 On 3/20/2022 at 3:40 AM, Grailknight said: Vehicles are something you expect to use multiple times though. These are just attacks . I've written up missiles for Star Hero, as well as Autonomous Kill Vehicles. They're both single use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCUBA Hero Posted March 24, 2022 Author Report Share Posted March 24, 2022 An article about the Switchblade drone, with some pics: The 'kamikaze drone' the US is sending Ukraine is a 'pretty powerful' tool for troops, top Marine general says (msn.com) A swarm of those things would be a holy terror for infantry and armor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steriaca Posted April 14, 2022 Report Share Posted April 14, 2022 I shutter thinking about the VIPER equivalent weapon systems. My version of SAT, in my mind, had some drone expert agents using drones as indirect fire weapons (if I would put them to paper, they would be RKA, Indirect, Physical Incarnations along with Clairvoyance abilities). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.