quozaxx Posted February 7, 2010 Report Share Posted February 7, 2010 If you wanted to make a character/villain/monster that literally grows whenever he is shot or hit; would you use Absorption to Growth, or simply Growth with a Trigger? Even though I think that Absorption to Growth would be a viable power; it may become expensive. Because first you have to have 1 level of Growth, Persistent, No END, and Then both Absorption to Energy and Physical (and a large amount of it) to compensate for the extra Growth + Persistent + No END. Would you ever use Absorption to Growth? Since Growth has extra PD and ED would you have to divide that by 1/2 since you are also raising a defense? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daltwisney Posted February 7, 2010 Report Share Posted February 7, 2010 Re: Absorption to Growth You are right, it will quickly become expensive, though there wouldn't be a requirement that it be Persistent or 0 END. As an Adjustment Power, Absorption simply requires you to have the Adjusted Power. There could be circumstances where it would be useful, I have never had any reason to consider it, so I can't say if I would use it or not. Since Growth is not by itself a 'Defense', I don't think it would be subject to the halving rule. The defense provided by Growth is sort of a 'side effect'. Besides, it is already going to be expensive, so applying the halving rule would make it ridiculously so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Samson Posted February 8, 2010 Report Share Posted February 8, 2010 Re: Absorption to Growth I played the Growing Man in a one-shot game before. Absorption to Growth should turn out cheaper than Triggered Growth, especially in 6e where the higher levels of Growth get proportionally more expensive. You only need a minimal amount of Growth (you can now purchase Persistent without 0 END) and enough Absorption so that you can absorb the campaigns best attacks (6d6, using the Standard Effect Rule, will allow you to absorb upto 18 pts. for example). Increase your Absorption maximum based on how big you want to be able to get. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daltwisney Posted February 8, 2010 Report Share Posted February 8, 2010 Re: Absorption to Growth I played the Growing Man in a one-shot game before. Absorption to Growth should turn out cheaper than Triggered Growth' date=' especially in 6e where the higher levels of Growth get proportionally more expensive. You only need a minimal amount of Growth (you can now purchase Persistent without 0 END) and enough Absorption so that you can absorb the campaigns best attacks (6d6, using the Standard Effect Rule, will allow you to absorb upto 18 pts. for example). Increase your Absorption maximum based on how big you want to be able to get.[/quote'] Under 6E, Absorption is no longer bought as d6's. You buy it as the maximum Body you can absorb in a Segment, and the 'default' maximum you can absorb is 2x that. Since it's a non-random effect now, Standard Effect wouldn't apply. On the flip side, it's extremely cheap, at 1 pt per Body/Segment. Every doubling of the max 'absorb-able' is a +1/4. And in most cases, it will be FAR cheaper than Triggered Growth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattingly Posted February 8, 2010 Report Share Posted February 8, 2010 Re: Absorption to Growth I prefer Absorption to Shrinking. "Fool! Your puny energy blasts only make me smaller!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodkins Odds Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Re: Absorption to Growth I prefer Absorption to Shrinking. "Fool! Your puny energy blasts only make me smaller!" I've given too much rep in the past 24-hours, etc… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Checkmate Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 Re: Absorption to Growth I prefer Absorption to Shrinking. "Fool! Your puny energy blasts only make me smaller!" You're weird. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmjalund Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 Re: Absorption to Growth We keep hitting him bit his goiter just keeps getting bigger! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaberegan Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 Re: Absorption to Growth I prefer Absorption to Shrinking. "Fool! Your puny energy blasts only make me smaller!" At least it's not partial shrinkage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattingly Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 Re: Absorption to Growth You're weird. You have no idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boll Weevil Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 Re: Absorption to Growth I prefer Absorption to Shrinking. "Fool! Your puny energy blasts only make me smaller!" Works only with ice/cold or water Blasts (3/4) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoloOfEarth Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 Re: Absorption to Growth You're weird. Oh, so you've seen Dave's Dr. Funkenstein and his supervillain group, Soul Force... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.