Re: Jokes
Re. the rail-gauge/horse-width post. I was skeptical up to:
Wow, I spotted this as three goofs in one, just from my own scattered readings.
A) The number of war chariots the Romans ever used could be counted on the fingers of one centuria; the number ever used by the Romans in Britain is a small fraction of the total.
The roads the Romans built, some of which were in active use through the Renaissance, were particularly resistant to rutting. They were carefully laid, and surfaced with the toughest stone available. They took a lot of traffic before any appreciable wear showed. And most of that wear came in the centuries after the "fall of Rome," mostly by being used as convenient "stone quarries."
C) How come every single war chariot followed exactly the same path down roads two or three times as wide as said chariots? For the entire length of time the Romans and the Romanized Celtic locals had war chariots available?
Nope, sorry, doesn't even start to work. And Snopes went way too easy on it.
For a fuller debunking, see The Straight Dope (NB: the "rutways" he mentions were ruts deliberately built into a road, to force wagons into following a certain path.
Even better, see this HTML-ified version of a PDF (or d/l the PDF if you want to see the pictures)