Re: [4color] Why do you dislike the Iron Age style? (No flames, ok?) I view it as sort of a pendulum. In the Golden Age, there were no moral quandries. There was no internal struggle for the hero. The bad guys were irretrievably bad. The good guys had no flaws.Now, in the Iron Age, the pendulum has swung the other way - too far, IMO. Everything is a moral gray area. Heroes are hard to tell from villains. Their methods are no different; sometimes, even their goals don't differ much.To my mind, the Silver Age presented the best balance. You still had clear delineation between the good guys and the bad guys, but there were enough gray areas to allow you to identify with the characters. You still had angst, and internal conflict, and so forth. "Spider-Man No More", anyone? Peter had to struggle with the fact that being Spider-Man was screwing up his life, and had to make a choice - what was more valuable? Should he pursue the life of a hero and admit that it would impinge on his own dreams? Or should he pursue those dreams and allow innocents to be hurt?In a Silver Age story, you have these conflicts, but, in the end, the hero makes the "right" choice. This is what makes him a hero. You still have the human element, and he sometimes makes mistakes, but he represents a role model, someone to look up to, to admire. That, IMO, is what is missing from many Iron Age stories. There's no one and nothing to admire - everyone is nearly the same. And you really don't want to emulate them."A man's reach should exceed his grasp, else what's a Heaven for?" - Robert Browning