Jump to content

How to build: A magic staff that obviates the energy cost for spells?


Ragitsu

Recommended Posts

Aid to End Standard Effect. The end comes from the Staff first, then from personal end.

or if the Casters use an End Reserve for Mana. Just have a mana reserve built into the staff. Just handwave that you pull end from the Staff first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Naked 0 END Advantage on a OAF, statted for, oh, say 100 Active Points ... That's what, 25 Real Points?

This one right here.  Or 1/2 End if you feel uncomfortable with 0 End.  That alone would be a huge help to most spell casters and would be a huge reason why they would all carry magical staffs.

 

Also, the staff could have a small bonus to the Magic Skill roll built in.  +1 or +2 at most. (a really powerful one might be +3)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Naked 0 END Advantage on a OAF, statted for, oh, say 100 Active Points ... That's what, 25 Real Points?

A Naked Advantage is the most fitting answer. Wheter you use 0 END or 1/2 End is up to you. 1/2 Sounds very helpfull already. Keep in mind that the effect get's halved when combined with Autofire Spells (or you have to buy up to the +1 Version of 0 END to fully cover Autofire Spells).

 

Also not that if the spell has any Increased Endurance Limitations, those have to be taken care of seperately using APG I 142's buyoff rules. That can become a problem (as the buyoff is so far only desigend to work on single powers).

 

One other version I can think off:

Endurance Reserve (X END, Y REC), OAF (-1)

plus

Group Naked Advantage "Power Can Draw END From Character Or Endurance Reserve (+1/4)" for up to 100 AP of Spells, 25 AP, OAF (-1)

 

Basically this gives you an extra Mana pool with Seperate Regeneration.

The Naked advantage is nessesary as likely the spells are not written with the Advnatage so they could not draw from the End Reserve (by default Powers use either Personal END or endurance Reserve, defined when writing them up). As a GM you could wave the need for it in this case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd go for a simple build: + x END, only for casting (-1/2), OAF.

That's simple to run and avoids the difficulties you get with a naked reduced END advantage and powers with nonstandard END requirements, like spells with reduced END, autofire or the increased END disadvantage.

 

It also avoids the nonintuitive issue you get that a staff built as a naked advantage only helps weaker spells, so when you really need help to cast a powerful spell with a high END cost, the staff built to help with END use ... doesn't help.

 

Cheers, Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...