Jump to content

Interesting article about Sexism in Geek Communities


Tasha

Recommended Posts

So I don't really follow video games, but #gamergate has apparently gotten so ugly that NPR had to cover it yesterday.  My understanding is that some female industry journalists pointed out that mainstream video game culture is sexist and misogynistic, and mainstream video game culture rebutted that argument with rape and death threats serious enough to drive those women into hiding.  Is that an accurate characterization?

 

 

While not all that in the know, my understanding is a bit different. 

 

 

A female game developer cheated on her boyfriend with members of the game journalism press. Some time later her ex boyfriend put up a long form blog detailing their relationship along with reasons why he thought she had cheated on him (proof, not why she did the act). People got upset for a variety of reasons. The more sane individuals in the bunch were upset because of the very thin line between Game Devs and Game Journalists. Later it came out that she may have also had relationships with other press members (if I recall correctly) thus putting the entire industry under greater amounts of scrutiny. 

 

All while this was going on, the less sane members started harassing her. She and many others posted about that harassment and that lead to even more harassment unfortunately. 

 

So, from the information I have, it wasn't about some woman complaining about treatment of women in the industry, but more similar to the complaints about how the financial industry and its regulators are far too chummy mixed in with a bit of a sex scandal and a good heaping of hatred. 

 

La Rose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Siskel and Ebert made their own 'tropes vs. women' video in 1980

And something tells me that they didn't get rape & death threats for it...

That was pre-Internet, but in Chicago to boot. Those two things might sum to a wash. :rolleyes:

 

OTOH, I would be surprised if there wasn't a similar item by someone else rather before that. I am not enough of a scholar of popular media (or feminism) to be able to find one, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While not all that in the know, my understanding is a bit different. 

 

 

A female game developer cheated on her boyfriend with members of the game journalism press. Some time later her ex boyfriend put up a long form blog detailing their relationship along with reasons why he thought she had cheated on him (proof, not why she did the act). People got upset for a variety of reasons. The more sane individuals in the bunch were upset because of the very thin line between Game Devs and Game Journalists. Later it came out that she may have also had relationships with other press members (if I recall correctly) thus putting the entire industry under greater amounts of scrutiny. 

 

All while this was going on, the less sane members started harassing her. She and many others posted about that harassment and that lead to even more harassment unfortunately. 

 

So, from the information I have, it wasn't about some woman complaining about treatment of women in the industry, but more similar to the complaints about how the financial industry and its regulators are far too chummy mixed in with a bit of a sex scandal and a good heaping of hatred. 

 

La Rose. 

From what I've read;

 

the promiscuity is true, but something of a smokescreen. The non-interested sources I've read point out that while she may have had a relationship with one of the reporters, it didn't seem to equate into any kind of free press. Certainly not the kind to build a scandal out of. Nor did her game win any awards given by "compromised" entities (ie judged by men she may have slept with)

 

Also the woman in question lurks on 4chan and she (as well as a few others on her side) quoted messages from the various threads where the goal was less "Journalistic integrity*" and more "Make the girl suffer." The 4chan group "made the data available" in a huge 3k+ page dump as proof that they were not targeting her for abuse and apparently didn't think anyone would go through it. And apparently (again according to what I've read as I wasn't going to read 3k pages of 4chan for any reason) it was a rather large number of the posts. (though could have been a small, very vocal group)

 

 

 

 

 

*This has been a problem for ages with the Gaming industry - not because some indie game designer with girl parts slept with a contributor to a game magazine - but because the AAA game companies basically use "journalists" to sell their games. Withholding trial copies, leveraging their advertising, etc. to get favorable press, up to and including getting not-on-board journalists fired from publications if they say bad things about their games. So the uproar about the girl seems to be based more on her parts rather than the integrity of an indie gaming mag/contest. Again this could be the roar of the minority. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a similar vein...

 

Why does DC Comics keep insulting its fans?

 

 

There needs to be a fundamental change of thought in the Comics industry to ensure that there are people in the decision making process willing to stop these things from happening before they ever reach the consumer. Whether that means firing some of the people already in that chain of command, whether it means hiring more women to offer their perspective, whatever - it just needs to happen, and happen soon. Situations like this aren't just offensive to women, they're offensive to all comic fans. As someone who loves comics, I'd rather not feel like I'm getting my intelligence insulted every time DC cocks up.

 

But while we wait for that to happen, what can comic book fans do about it? Well, what they're doing right now: kicking up a storm whenever something like this happens. Not just for DC, but for Marvel, Disney, whoever - let them know that products like this have no place in 2014. Encourage them when they respond and apologise, when they do something about them - but perhaps most importantly, remind them that it would be even better if these scandals didn't happen at all. DC need to stop being reactive only when the public calls them out on sexism, and start actively beginning to ensure that these situations just don't happen again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

To me it sounds like some troll is being a troll with the "philosophyofrape" page. Next, the cited numbers for page views and subscribers does NOT indicate support. And to push the 'these terrible sub-reddits have thousands of supporters' is showing a willful blindness to the fact that people, possibly like the author himself, subscribe to such sites to keep tabs on the happenings of them. And given that they are such great headline bait, it is unsurprising that people have followed links to those pages. Heck, the author of this piece fell foul of that exact same issues as he placed links to those questionable pages in his own article. And there is nothing wrong with what he did (providing links) but to then complain about views seems questionable at best. 

 

 

La Rose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

So a major hardware and software company had advertisements on a website that targets their key demographics. However that company decided to pull its ads from that site for whatever reasons. Now people are claiming they don't support women? Is it too early to call BS on this? I hope not. 

 

If the website was drawing a lot of negative attention, I can see why a brand might want to pull their ad support. It has nothing to do with supporting that website and the equality of the sexes, either. I can think of a few reasons why they might want to do this:

 

1) If they are supporting the site much the same way google ads support sites, then their click over traffic is important to them. But if the site is having an increase in traffic due to this news story but not generating extra click over traffic, it is a bad investment. It is an even worse one if they are paying per ad shown vs per ad clicked. 

 

2) The company needs to make sure that its brand is seen with a positive lens. If the audience of that site (on either side of the gamer gate issue) is agitated due to 'misogynists' or 'feminists' or 'my little pony' or whatever, then their perception of other things on that site is going to be equally tarnished. It is why high-end retail chooses very carefully where they put up ads so as to protect the mystique of being high end. Intel needs to do the same. 

 

3) Any number of contractual or financial issue that the website wasn't adhering to could cause Intel to pull support. 

 

At the end of the day, some people want to crucify anyone they can. This seems like such people are grasping at straws to attack Intel. 

 

La Rose.

 

In full disclosure, I have a favorable view of Intel since they are a major sponsor of the StarCraft 2 e-sports events around the world and have brought me countless hours of quality entertainment. Much like RedBull. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...