Re: Interesting article about Sexism in Geek Communities
My response:
I’m male and I agree with this article 100%. Well, in the interest of full disclosure, I’ll admit that I enjoy good-looking women in games. I hope that doesn’t invalidate my opinions.
I absolutely agree that women are people and deserve to have their needs and desires addressed equally in games (and other forms of entertainment). You also hit an important point regarding how the depiction of women in media shapes people’s perceptions. There doesn’t seem to be much for me to say on that beyond, “yeah, what she said!”
I’d also like to add that even as a male, I experience a bit–just a little–of what you’re experiencing. Games (and other media) seem to cater to one very narrow male ideal: the badass warrior. That be what a lot of guys want to see themselves as, but me? I’m a technician/engineer. My primary asset is my intelligence, not my muscle, reflexes, tactical skills, or any other badassery-related attribute. Games basically tell me that I don’t “really matter” as a person, that the best I can hope for is fixing the real hero’s gear as he goes by.
Sure, some games have heroes who are said to be intelligent or technically competent . . . but those attributes aren’t what carries the game. Gordon Freeman has a PhD in theoretical physics . . . and all he does is fight stuff. Commander Shepherd can be an “engineer”, but the techiest thing he/she does is attack the enemy with a smartphone. Isaac Clarke is an engineer, but Dead Space is all about killing things in personal combat.
So, I can agree that it sucks to have games tell you that you’ll never be anything but an NPC.