For those new to the board, here is my most unpopular opinion ever:
I have absolutely _no problem_ with this.
Yep. I made the mistake of saying that out loud during early debates on "Independent" way back when, and it proved to be the most evil possible thing a person could utter in this particular fandom.
Worse yet: We've been doing it since the 80s.
And unimaginably impossible follow-up:
It's never _been_ a problem. Not once. It doesn't happen a _lot_, or even particularly _often_, but it does happen. I've even let players burn an EP or two to make outrageous changes to die rolls at critical moments. Again, not often, but sometimes it's just there.
And it has never been a problem. Not once.
Believe it or not, this actually started under my first Champions GM with that old "Powers for Champions!" article in Dungeon Magazine-- the one with Bouncing, etc? The "Extra Life" power: buy it and permanently lose 2 EP, but here's the great thing it does....."
The thing, I think, was timing. When we were first exposed to the idea, there was no internet. There was no "let me bounce this off a couple hundred complete strangers I will never actually sit down and play a game with due to geographic distances, etc. What they have to say is crucial to how we play our game." There was just our little group of six, and Hell-- the tradeoff seemed _more_ than fair: get out of Dead free card? Lose two EP? Two EP that I'll likely replace in the next session? Sign me up! Maybe it's because none of us were studying to be accountants or software gurus or what-have-you: we didn't _need_ a balance sheet that perfectly tracked where all our earnings went. And seriously, it wasn't like that four-point pea shooter was going to break us anyway. We could drop four more EP on another one, if we wanted, or we could drop two hundred Federated on one in the next port we stopped at. Either way.
Maybe it's because we _never_ spent EP the minute we earned it. We were all (and still are) "terrible" about banking it until we're ready to do something with it.
So it's "meta." So what? As LL said in the current "which edition" thread, it fits a sweet spot for us personally.
I didn't mean to ramble on so much about it-- particularly knowing how unpopular it is. But every now and again, I just feel it needs to be said. Same book; different book; only one book: doesn't matter. None of us are playing the exact same game, and likely we never will.