Badger

Xenomorphs vs Zombies

Gibson, even if he is batpoop crazy in real life.

Who. Slappy Squirrel and nephew did the Abbott & COstello bit over their name. Stand up comic battle Amy Shumer vs your average coral reef

​Napoleon's Russian Invasion Force vs. an angry honey badger

Trout stream, I'm going with that because.....Mike Trout.

Hmm, if we do this again, maybe next time we can have a minimum quota from other avenues. Even if not anime, a DC and Marvel fest can get a little boring.

I showed up late to vote. After the first 3 tournaments I completely given up and lost hope. Note: Hadnt checked in 2 weeks, apparently the waiting was for the final voting was for me to go on to other projects.

You mean if you are a policeman you arent supposed to let yourself be shot?

Because I'm evil Note: And you should talk given your next reply

I like dark chocolate the most of all chocolates, But, I will never be accused of refusing chocolate (except German chocolate, I really don't care for) Chocolate! Chocolate! CHOCOLATE!

I'd have to with Etrigan. Seems like demon beat mutant. Mordor vs. Sparta

Is this a molestation contest? If so, Cosby easily, he seems to have molested half a state. Skynet vs Windows Vista. Who wipes out humanity? Edit: Cant remember if I done this one.

WHat no Kremzeek from the Transformers cartoon in the 80s. (whose vocabulary consisted of saying Kremzeek in the most annoying way possible about 80 times during the episode)

Lions, I refuse the existence of the other. Cant remember if I did this one (meant to): (The alternate Eastern front) Nazi Army of Vampires and Werewolves vs Soviet Army Hybrid Human-Apes

​the late Steve Irwin vs Killer Croc

THorn, I think he was (super)naturally evil from birth, Regan was possessed.

Making sense of quantum mechanics make badger's brain 'splode

1970s Superfriends version of Superman vs Patrick Starfish vs. a rock....... on Jeopardy

Snake Plissken, and I dont have to give a reason. THough, I still would like to know what exactly happened to Fresno Bob.

Indeed, and I dont think we exactly have a precedent in real life of one who continually escapes from prison to kill indiscriminately. At least to my knowledge, which does put a damper on any illusion to whether Batman should kill him or not.

Difference? He would have killed a murderer, who has shown the ability to A)Easily escape from prison B)kills at the rate of the Black Plague seemingly, nearly every time he does A. So, yeah, it would be a corruption of Batman, but yes he would still be "better" as it would be an unfortunate "service" to the citizenry of Gotham. Blame the writers for making the Joker challenging the records of Chairman Mao, and making Arkham easier to escape from than a broken baby crib. It isn't like I enjoy the thought, but Batman and the police cant be that dumb. To your last question, the difference between a mass murderer who cant be stopped by other means, and a thief who likes providing his foes with clues to his eventual capture, should be fairly obvious.

Heh, though only effective if both sides are nice.

In reality this is a good argument. In Batman comics, when the Joker escapes from Arkham every Tuesday, kills 8 people before lunch, gets caught by Batman. Rinse and repeat, to next Tuesday, then not so much.

The Joker Is Awesome Club? Are they the same ones who think him and Harley have the "ideal" relationship?

You know there isnt any point into going into the Hillary thing. If you still believe Hillary is innocent, there is literally nothing that can be said to prove it to you. So dont even bother asking that as I know you were in this discussion in 2016. Simply, ignore that part of my post if need be. Respected in the bureau? Yes, I heard that from the interim head. Pardon me, if I dont take his word for it. Though, to be fair, I dont have an actual opinion, on what I believe on the bureau's opinion on the whole about Comey, but I am not going to take the temp's word alone for it. I frankly, would have been surprised if he said otherwise, actually. I am actually open-minded on the FBI opinion on Comey, but not by interim guy, I'd have to hear from rank-and-file. What they actually say, I will believe. Edit: It's possible he was being too impartial. He was either trying to be too impartial or too partial. (or he was as incompetent as I fear). Regardless, if you asked the liberal side last Friday the answer you get is "Comey threw the election" possibly worse accusations. They hated the guy, he was (apologies to Putin) THE scapegoat to Hillary's loss. As soon as he gets fired that all changed. Wailing commences, he'll probably be called a martyr for a noble cause before the weekend is done. The smell of that hypocrisy is putrid. And I am actually for an investigation on Russia. I am a bit more skeptical to Russia's involvement than most here (more impartial than skeptical actually, but that unfortunately =skeptic nowadays). But, I think anything like that is of utmost seriousness, and must be investigated. I also have absolutely no confidence, COmey is capable of leading an investigation of my local speeding ticket in 1995, let alone a possible upended election that turns the world upside down. (course, do I believe Comey is really that grossly idiotic? I admit not really, in the truest sense. I believe he was in way over his head for a job as bureau chief, and has done nothing on any level to prove otherwise, and has shown absolutely no reason not to pack him and send him to obscurity. But, I do admit snark mode did click on. Bottom line is he is not up to his role, the liberal talking heads can cry all they want about the firing, but it is akin to mourning at a funeral of the relative you most hated). It is what it is.