Re: Would you allow the white knight defense?
I have a lot less issue with someone who wants to create an "invulnerable" type that a lot of GMs I run into.
I don't see why it's game breaking to have a Character that is effectively (if not absolutely) physically invulnerable. I feel to many GMs fall back on Hurting and/or Knocking Out Characters as the way to defeat them.
Damage is not the only tool in the box.
And this being a point based system, they are trading off using so many points in one area for having points in another. Typically offense, but it could just as easily be Movement, Non-Conventional Aspects or even Non-Combat capability. No matter how you slice it, they're reduced or missing abilities in another aspect.
I'd allow it.