Jump to content

st barbara

HERO Member
  • Posts

    3,592
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by st barbara

  1. On 12/8/2017 at 9:33 AM, zslane said:

     

    Actually, it is quite bad given that there is virtually no way JL will break even from its theatrical run.

     

    There is a formula that, given the opening weekend box office results, will predict the overall revenue for a film to an uncanny degree of accuracy. The $94M opening number pretty much guarantees that JL will not make back its production and advertising costs until years from now after all its ancillary revenue has rolled in (home video, streaming, toys/games, etc.). That makes it difficult to bankroll the next round of films in the slate which need financing secured in 2018. The failure to hit it big with JL will have enormous repercussions within WB/DC. It screws them (and their plans) in ways that folks who have never been involved in the industry--and feature film financing in particular--can't begin to imagine.

    Well I don't know about any "formula", but , according to figures on :Box Office Mojo" "Justice League " has already made back its production costs. Advertising costs, I don't know about.

  2. On 11/24/2017 at 11:51 AM, Nothere said:

    These two books sound like they have a lot of repeat entries.

    Nevins says in his introduction "Fantastic Pulp Heroes" is intended to cover all the heroes who appeared in science fiction,fantasy and horror stories. "Pulp Adventurers" is intended to cover all the heroes who aren't the protagonists of science fiction,fantasy and  horror stories ".  I haven't yet found any repeat entries.  Another volume (which I don't have) covers pulp cowboys and there may be others planned.

  3. "toddbanister" Try looking on the net for "Nostalgia Ventures Inc" or "Sanctum Productions". They have reprinted a number of the "Doc Savage" stories in a large size magazine format complete with illustrations and essays by people such as Will Murray (One of the authors of the post 1975 stories mentioned by "Spence").

  4. 1 hour ago, bigdamnhero said:

    ...I honestly can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not? You just described the top five things that ruin a movie for me. Those aren't exactly minor technical points; they're the minimum qualifications for Not Shitty.

     

    As for reviews, I only listen to the handful of reviewers whose opinions I trust. It's harder now that Roger Ebert has left us - whether or not *he* liked a movie, I could almost always tell if *I* was going to like it from his reviews.

    I felt much the same way about Ebert.  He always seemed to explain WHY he reacted to any given movie the way he did..

  5. I saw the movie last night and generally enjoyed it.Yes Wonder Woman was moping a bit, but she was also the fierce warrior princess at times too. I especially liked the new, kick ass Aquaman and the young naive Flash (although I agree he might not be to everyone's taste). After the very serious tone of "Batman vs Superman" it was good to see a bit of humour in a D C movie. I don't give a damn what "Rotten Tomatoes" or anyone else says, I enjoyed it and I am looking forward to the sequel that is hinted at in the post credit sequence. I hope it does well at the box office.

  6. Well if someone else is going to be running Zimbabwe I hope that they can do a better job that Mugabe. While cronyism, graft and corruption are rife in Africa old Robbie took it to a new level, and ruined his nation in the process. I don't envy the new government if they are actually trying to improve life for the average citizen. They will be starting from a long way back !

  7. Just got my copies of Jess Nevins' "The Encyclopedia Of  Fantastic Pulp Heroes" and "The Encyclopedia Of Pulp Adventurers". Lots of characters that I don't know (of course) and at least ONE surprise omission, Eric John Stark, unless I missed him, but otherwise it looks like good fun and very worthwhile, as can be expected of Nevins. I haven't read right through them yet, but they will definately fill a gap in my reference library.

  8. If they want to reinstate the "Assault weapons" ban I think that they need to be more specific in their definition of an "assault weapon". I don't know what that definition should look like but something like "any semi automatic shoulder arm with a detatchable magazine" would seem to be a starting point for such a definition.

×
×
  • Create New...