Jump to content

More space news!


tkdguy

Recommended Posts

The May issue of Scientific American has an excellent article on reconstructing the formation of the Solar System. Based upon both computer simulations and studied of the exoplanets discovered by Kepler, it was a stranger, more complex and far more violent process than astronomers imagined just 20 years ago. I was especially interested in the anomaly astronomers didn't even realize was anomalous pre=Kepler: Why doesn't the inner Solar System include a few super-Earths? Most seem to.

 

Dean Shomshak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

This month's issue of Scientific American has a nifty article on new types of supernova-like phenomena, and astronomers' attempts to find and explain them. To begin with, new observational techniques result in astronomers finding more supernovae in a week than they found in the entire 20th century. As a result, rare phenomena are being observed that don't fit what astronomers thought they knew about supernovae, such as events 100 times brighter or only 1% as bright. Attempts to explain these events lead to speculations about further SN-like phenomena and attempts to spot them.

 

My own favorite is the "unnova." It begins with the fact that astronomers no longer know how massive a star can get -- they've found stars that are much bigger than they thought possible. And you'd think that more massive stars would result in bigger kabooms, right? But when the core of a sufficiently massive star collapses, instead of forming a neutron star (with consequent rebounding shock wave that detonates the rest of the star as a supernova), it might collapse directly into a black hole. No rebound, no shock wave, no explosion. The rest of the star's mass just keeps falling in and the star just... winks out.

 

Colliding neutron stars might also produce something very strange, a sort of sub-supernova blast concentrated in the far red and infrared that sprays out a cloud of heavy elements.

 

The fun thing is, if something is so extraordinary that it would happen only once in a billion years in a single galaxy, it probably happens every day in the Universe as a whole. So you just have to watch enough galaxies to see something that leaves you gobsmacked.

 

Dean Shomshak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the merging neutron star idea: if one of those happens "nearby", then LIGO would detect it. Once a third gravity-wave observatory comes on line, there's the chance to get a solution on a space position, so that other instruments can try seeing it. Which could be a huge win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

But when the core of a sufficiently massive star collapses, instead of forming a neutron star (with consequent rebounding shock wave that detonates the rest of the star as a supernova), it might collapse directly into a black hole. No rebound, no shock wave, no explosion. The rest of the star's mass just keeps falling in and the star just... winks out.

 

This is the way the world ends / Not with a bang but a whimper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...