Is TK too expensive?

[stan da ork]

I was trying to build a Psychokinetic today, and I realized, TK is really farking expensive. It is more expensive per d6 than any other Normal damage Power. And once you apply BoECV, it becomes ridiculous. Now, I understand that the cost is based on the cost of STR, with Ranged applied. However, I think that this overlooks an important point. Specifically, Advantaged Characteristics still add to Figured Characteristics normally. So if I were to buy STR with the Advantage Ranged (I know, technically not allowed), I'd still get the PD, REC, and STUN from that STR. So to better estimate the cost, I think you should also apply the No Figured Characteristics Limitation, bringing the cost of TK back down to 5 points per d6, in line with STR, HtH Attack, and EB.

 

Now, would this really unbalance the game? I realize this makes TK a bit better than EB, because it has the other STR-like abilities of lifting, Grabbing, etc. But STR is already way better than HtH Attack, and yet people still buy that Power all the time. And as usual, the GM still has to accept the concept of why you picked TK over EB (I would find the Human Torch hard to believe with TK instead of a fire-based EB). Personally, I think this would balance out just fine, and I think it would make TK a much more usable ability.

 

Comments? Thoughts?

[Fox1]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

There is one additional gain- TK is considered indirect to begin with. Can be useful.

 

All that said however, I tend to consider the DC for TK as opposed to it's active points for campaign caps and than back off a couple to account for its greater utility over EB and the like.

 

As far as changing the point costs- no. I try to avoid that as much as possible for two reasons.

 

First is that I want to stay as close to the construction rules as possible. Second, the points don't indicate real game balance and I don't generally use point limits anyway. So it doesn't matter to me.

[Kyle A.]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

First of all, you can apply Ranged to STR the book says it should normaly not be allowed. Second of all, as some people on this board have mentioned allowing BOECV to be applied to TK as a 0 advantage does not unbalance the game. It even makes sense. What form of Telekinesis is not controlled by thought? Pyrokinesis, Hydrokinesis, Magnekinesis (I made that word up, don't call me on it), Aerokinesis. All forms of TK that are not bought as a device are targeted with your mind and not how steady your arm is.

[Roy_The_Ruthles]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

I Think TK is balanced. Otherwise you can get some abusive situations if it becomes better than EB

[stan da ork]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

Fox1 - That is a very legitimate point (the Indirect aspect), and one I had forgotten until after I made the post. That alone probably makes TK balanced the way it is, since that is anywhere from a +1/4 to +1 Advantage. Also, your approach to it seems to make sense, and is probably more fair in most campaigns anyway. And like you said, it avoids point cost changes, which are always potentially dangerous. And though I agree with you that points themselves don't create balance, some people don't, and I like to try to balance the points as much as possible just so judging balance is a bit easier.

 

Kyle A. - You are also correct, and you can always just ignore the book. However, I'd like to have a good reason to ignore the book and go my own way before I just up and do it. I have never heard of BoECV being a +0 Advantage for TK, but I haven't been around all that long. It makes sense, as you said, and I almost think that TK should just be based off either standard OCV or OECV, at the player's option when the Power is purchased, with no effect on the points involved (also see my thread on Partial BoECV).

 

Roy_The_Ruthles - That is a very real concern, and one of the main reasons I asked the question. After considering the other comments I've received so far, I think I'm going to leave TK alone (although I may adopt Kyle A.'s +0 switch on it).

[Roy_The_Ruthles]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

no problem, glad to help stan

[Magmarock]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

Also, the advantage to using TK over, say, a Stretched punch, is that if it triggers a Damage Shield, the attacker won't get targeted. Then there is the indirect aspect.

 

Mags

[Markdoc]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

There is also the cost/benefit analysis. The flexibility of TK really can be very effective - unlike EB once you hit someone (with a grab) you've got them - you can keep squeezing, effectively getting continuous (or a near approximation) for free. Even better, you can use them to hit someone else.

 

It's not purely a theoretical consideration: I have played in two games where the GM went through the same thought process you have outlined and reduced the cost to 5 points for 5 STR, and there is no doubt that in both games the TK-using characters dominated all others in combat: plus they got useful out of combat abilities from the power as well.

 

As a GM, TK is one of those powers I am quite careful of.

 

cheers, Mark

[Hawksmoor]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

For the record I do not advocate true BOECV. Instead since EGO is a targeting stat, priced at the same level as DEX (no Figureds...which fits EGO since EGO does not provide a figured stat) that for certain SFX (Psychokinesis for instance) that the player be allowed at character creation to irrevocably tie his OCV when using this power to EGO instead of DEX. The power would still be visible, still have range mods, and still target the defenders (in all likelihood) higher DEX based DCV. So far, in my small F2F game the effect has not been unbalancing or even really noticable.

 

Hawksmoor

[MitchellS]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

Fox1 - That is a very legitimate point (the Indirect aspect), and one I had forgotten until after I made the post. That alone probably makes TK balanced the way it is, since that is anywhere from a +1/4 to +1 Advantage. Also, your approach to it seems to make sense, and is probably more fair in most campaigns anyway. And like you said, it avoids point cost changes, which are always potentially dangerous. And though I agree with you that points themselves don't create balance, some people don't, and I like to try to balance the points as much as possible just so judging balance is a bit easier.

 

Kyle A. - You are also correct, and you can always just ignore the book. However, I'd like to have a good reason to ignore the book and go my own way before I just up and do it. I have never heard of BoECV being a +0 Advantage for TK, but I haven't been around all that long. It makes sense, as you said, and I almost think that TK should just be based off either standard OCV or OECV, at the player's option when the Power is purchased, with no effect on the points involved (also see my thread on Partial BoECV).

 

Roy_The_Ruthles - That is a very real concern, and one of the main reasons I asked the question. After considering the other comments I've received so far, I think I'm going to leave TK alone (although I may adopt Kyle A.'s +0 switch on it).

One of the advantages of BoECV is that it makes a power indirect by nature. If you can see someone through a window you can use a BoECV power on them. You don't need to worry about the barrier between you. That's why many people consider BoECV to be a +0, or at least no more than +1/4 advantage to TK.

 

TK should be purchased as: 5 strength, ranged: +1/2, indirect: +3/4, no figured characteristics: -1/2, no fine manipulation: -1/2. Total cost: 5 points.

 

The BoECV version would remove indirect and replace it with the BoECV advantage making the cost 6 points.

[incrdbil]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

If you go BOECV--then the target defends with ECV..something I'd rather not give away for free.

 

Another question: if you buy a power BOECV, whatever it is--is it legitimate to nail a target located by mindscan withthe BOECV power?

 

Yeesh. Talk about the assassin who never leaves home.

[atlascott]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

TK allows manipulation of things over a distance, and it is indirect. You aren't opening yourself up to damage shields, and it can be used if you are entangled, unlike strength or EB. I agree with folks that it should always be based on EGO, not DEX. But cost/effectiveness-wise, I think it ought to be more expensive, given its inherent advantages and flexibility.

[Roy_The_Ruthles]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

i looked at BoECV, and i think the target still defends with DCV, and it's not a mental power so it can't be targeted through mind scan.

[MitchellS]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

i looked at BoECV' date=' and i think the target still defends with DCV, and it's not a mental power so it can't be targeted through mind scan.[/quote']

No, the whole point of the advantage is so that you can use your ECV against the target's ECV. And you can also use mind scan in association with the power, but BoECV does not provide mental awareness and it's not invisible.

[Roy_The_Ruthles]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

No' date=' the whole point of the advantage is so that you can use your ECV against the target's ECV. And you can also use mind scan in association with the power, but BoECV does not provide mental awareness and it's not invisible.[/quote']

 

ah ok, then i'm wrong. it happens

[Legendsmiths]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

That is how I play TK - BoECV +0, targeted with ECV vs. DCV, although still considered a mental power it can't be targeted by Mind Scan (it is LoS).

[Silbeg]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

To start with, I apologize if this has already been effectively answered

If you go BOECV--then the target defends with ECV..something I'd rather not give away for free.

According to 5E p. 147, Psychokinesis (Tk w/ BOECV) targets DCV with OECV... So, one major advantage of BOECV goes away.

 

Another question: if you buy a power BOECV, whatever it is--is it legitimate to nail a target located by mindscan withthe BOECV power?

A BOECV power is not a mental power, so could not be targetted with Mind Scan (unless it could otherwise be targetted as such, such as the psychokinetic is flashed, and then uses his Mind Scan to overcome the loss of targetting sense).

 

One of the advantages of BoECV is that it makes a power indirect by nature. If you can see someone through a window you can use a BoECV power on them. You don't need to worry about the barrier between you. That's why many people consider BoECV to be a +0' date=' or at least no more than +1/4 advantage to TK. [/quote']

Not true... from the current Rules FAQ

Q: Does making a Power BOECV also make it Indirect?

A: No, but you can buy Indirect for it separately.

 

All of that being said, I personally do have an issue that BOECV Tk (Psychokinesis) is definately over-priced, since really the only thing it does is swap OCV for OECV... you will almost always affect PD, etc., so really, what is the big advantage? I would argue for +¼-½ as the proper advantage... haven't decided what to do in my game re: this (Shawn,Ben, if you are reading this... please let me know your opinion!)

[MitchellS]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

Not true... from the current Rules FAQ

The book says the advantage gives LOS, and LOS grants the ability to use the power through barriers as long as they can be seen through or the person has an ability to see through those barriers, such as with N-ray vision [the example from the book in LOS].

[Hugh Neilson]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

All of that being said' date=' I personally do have an issue that BOECV Tk ([i']Psychokinesis[/i]) is definately over-priced, since really the only thing it does is swap OCV for OECV... you will almost always affect PD, etc., so really, what is the big advantage? I would argue for +¼-½ as the proper advantage... haven't decided what to do in my game re: this (Shawn,Ben, if you are reading this... please let me know your opinion!)

 

I think Psychokinesis is not BoECV. I would allow the character to choose to target with ECV (changing no other aspects of the power) as a +1/4 advantage at most, and I agree that being allowed to define the targetting stat (DEX or Ego) for free when an attack power is purchased would be fully reasonable.

[MitchellS]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

I think Psychokinesis is not BoECV. I would allow the character to choose to target with ECV (changing no other aspects of the power) as a +1/4 advantage at most' date=' and I agree that being allowed to define the targetting stat (DEX or Ego) for free when an attack power is purchased would be fully reasonable.[/quote']

Psychokinesis is another of those rules exceptions I love some much in that it targets DCV instead of ECV like all other BoECV powers do.

[MitchellS]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

ah ok' date=' then i'm wrong. it happens[/quote']

You weren't wrong, in regards to psychokinesis. It's just a rules exception. All rules exceptions are stupid and confusing, IMHO.

[Hugh Neilson]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

Psychokinesis is another of those rules exceptions I love some much in that it targets DCV instead of ECV like all other BoECV powers do.

 

Agreed. Psychokinesis does not use BoECV - it doesn't gain the advantages of BoECV. Better to simply make Psychokinesis a specific advantage aplicable only to Telekinesis than to classify it as "BoECV", then make a huge number of changes to how BoECV works solely for this construct which serve primarily to reduce the value of BoECV with no cost reduction.

[Gary]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

One idea I like is to base TK on the HA concept. HA is Str with a mandatory -1/2 limitation. How about making TK, Str with a mandatory +1/2 advantage? Or perhaps a mandatory +1 advantage along with a mandatory -1/2 limitation?

[Hugh Neilson]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

Well, TH is Strength, Ranged (+1/2), Indirect (+3/4), No Figured (-1/2) so 10 STR TK = 15 character points

 

What about removing the automatic Indirect and making TK cost 1 point per poiint of STR, but it must pass through the intervening space (like a construct from Green Lantern's ring). Then, if you want Indirect TK, you simply buy Indirect, just like you do with other powers.

[BobGreenwade]

Re: Is TK too expensive?

 

Personally, I think Telekinesis is both too expensive and too broad. I'd rather see it at 1 point = 1 STR, but take away the choking and squeezing (if you want to damage a target at range, buy Energy Blast -- or at worst allow a +1/4 Advantage for a Telekinetic Squeeze). This would allow a character to lift large amounts of mass without spending a ridiculous amount of points, having to juggle Active Point barriers like crazy, or unbalancing the game.