Susano Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing What of the dude with the thing is a chick? Then she's Alicia Masters... and you might be in trouble if you try and kill her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Mackinder Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Gawd, I just realized how much I really missed this thread. So, where is the thing right now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyper-Man Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing ... So, where is the thing right now? changing channels Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveZilla Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing The problem with that whole "kill the dude with the thing" thing is that once you've killed the dude and taken the thing... you're now the dude with the thing! STumbled across this thread in an unrelated search. And so glad I did. So, every person who takes the thing becaomes the dude with the thing, that everybody is trying to kill... to take the thing? Sounds a lot like this game: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roth Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing I still say "kill everybody" and then get the thing. So if we kill everybody and get all their things then We'll be the dudes with the things? This kinda makes me wonder if this isn't the worst (or best) dungeon crawl ever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Susano Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Well, it beats tennis, 'cause tennis is still boring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xavier Onassiss Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing FOUND HIM! It's The Dude with the Thing!!! Uh... okay, now what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Now you kill the Dude and take the Thing. Geez, have you read any of this thread?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyper-Man Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Something to pull the room together.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xavier Onassiss Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Now you kill the Dude and take the Thing. Geez' date=' have you read [b']any[/b] of this thread?! Just like that, huh? Sheesh. Will you look at the SIZE of that Thing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Yeah, about five inches. So? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Susano Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Yeah' date=' about five inches. So?[/quote'] But that's five inches of pure plastic fury! Who knows what it might do if you get it riled up! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xavier Onassiss Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing But that's five inches of pure plastic fury! Who knows what it might do if you get it riled up! Not only that, but the Dude's got a bowling ball, and he knows how to use it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf Posted July 17, 2010 Report Share Posted July 17, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Beyond the point, the clear explanation involves killing of the dude, and taking of the thing.... not much else to work on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted July 18, 2010 Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Kill him how? Take it where? Really there is an awful lot of ambiguity in these instructions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Liaden Posted July 18, 2010 Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Seemed pretty clear to me from the starting post on the thread. Kill the Dude. Take the Thing. Get points. Enough Dudes/Things/points, you win. If you're on an existential quest, this definitely would not be your game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Susano Posted July 18, 2010 Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Look, it's simple: Got it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf Posted July 18, 2010 Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Kill him how? Take it where? Really there is an awful lot of ambiguity in these instructions. LOL, no, no, no, you can extrapolate quite a bit from what is given. When you have killed the dude with the thing and you take the thing, you then become the dude with the thing, and there fore must be killed, ergo you take it to a place where you won't get killed, which is unlikely because you are now the dude with the thing and must be killed. Once you are killed, then that person takes the thing, and after you are alive again you must kill the dude with the thing, then take the thing... So you see it really is as easy as, "kill the dude with the thing, and take the thing." I love this thread, and I don't even MMO game (and yes, I know, but I really don't MMO... RPG or otherwise so yes I mean MMO). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted July 18, 2010 Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Suicide seems to be the logical conclusion here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf Posted July 18, 2010 Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing I thought of that... However, my line of logic was this. You have killed the dude with the thing, you have taken the thing, and as such you are still under the "take the thing" clause in the statement. Otherwise if you are dead, how can you take the thing in that state, there for it's further backed as an action that is not in line with the statement "kill the dude with the thing and take the thing" because you can no longer follow through with the second part. So Due to having to entirely throw away the second part of the statement if you kill yourself (both before and after killing yourself), then I should think that it is not a viable option. Not to mention, you are going to have a great deal of people looking for you to kill you and take your thing, because you are indeed now the dude with the thing. So I should think that running and staying alive would be the only thing you'd be able to think about at the time. Not to mention, I figure if you stopped to think about it it would turn out like this, "Dude, I'm the guy with the thing, maybe I should kill my... hurk! Hey, I'm now dead, and he's got the thing!" but that is an assumption beyond the statement that was given. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Mackinder Posted July 18, 2010 Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Just like that' date=' huh? Sheesh. Will you look at the SIZE of that Thing?[/quote'] The size of the thing is irrelevant. The important thing is what you do with it. So, I use the thing to kill the dude .... Does that sound right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xavier Onassiss Posted July 18, 2010 Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing The size of the thing is irrelevant. The important thing is what you do with it. So, I use the thing to kill the dude .... Does that sound right? Well no, in point of fact. The instructions were quite clear: FIRST kill the Dude, THEN take the Thing. So it's not possible to 'use the thing to kill the dude' because that would involve FIRST taking the Thing, THEN killing the Dude, which is completely backwards. Sorry to rain on your parade, but you're just going to have to come up with a better plan. Preferably a plan consistent with the instructions. What I want to know is WHO exactly is this strange little woman, making flowcharts, bossing everyone around, and sending them forth to kill random Dudes and take their Things? I'm starting to think maybe she has some 'control issues.' I'm just a guy with a goatee, I didn't sign up for this.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Escafarc Posted July 18, 2010 Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing What I want to know is WHO exactly is this strange little woman, making flowcharts, bossing everyone around, and sending them forth to kill random Dudes and take their Things? I'm starting to think maybe she has some 'control issues.' Nancy Pelosi? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf Posted July 18, 2010 Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Nancy Pelosi? "Must spread rep..." yadida dadida.... oh, and ROTFLOL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Susano Posted July 18, 2010 Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 Re: Kill the Dude with the Thing Nancy Pelosi? Either that or Sarah Palin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.