A Game of Numbers

[Logan D. Hurricanes]

[Pariah]

Logan, you're such a romantic.

[Logan D. Hurricanes]

[Pariah]

3.071513805 or 7.072421901, depending on which base you're using. 

[Logan D. Hurricanes]

[Bazza]

That’s irrational. 

[Asperion]

Was he attempting to go for his pi and eat it as well?

[Cancer]

I'm waiting for the tale of the deep woods killer who went mad after he fractaled his skull in an accident in the forest, and who now leaves his victims' pieces lying about in non-orientable chaotic heaps.

[Logan D. Hurricanes]

[Cancer]

2 jiggers of 80 proof in a 12-ounce glass with ice and ....

[Cancer]

This thread is no longer on page 3.

[Cancer]

71 52 66 37 69 48 68 72 46 50 48 65 58 65 40 41 53 55 56 52 44 53 37 69 67 57 39 68 45 58 53 41 72 37 50 68 54 48 70 48 63 73 43 61 68 72 45 59 61 52 63 43 47 54 47 58 55 46 58 60 70 72 56 73 73 62 62 71 47 60 53 54 66 44 62 71 46 44 42 52 63 66 48 71 43 51 42 48 69 55 64 44 61 37 38 43 65 57 71 69 48 60 73 71 38 70 62 57 49 62 49 57 45 41 54 57 73 66 43 37 39 68 73 71 65 50 41 54 41 69 44 45 46 63 63 43 65 62 49 42 43 41 53 67 68 55 47 65 37 38 48 61 58 52 44 44 66 69 48 53 58 43 52 61 59 38 57 60 39 70 57 41 40 45 59 37 43 46 58 58 70 38 60 56 59 53 40 49 62 57 67 66 55 60 72 53 41 37 50 40 43 50 70 38 49 40 68 52 44 52 65 48 56 50 60 72 52 68 65 67 65 57 37 70 55 66 67 58 69 62 55 67 65 59 71 63 48 47 57 67 37 58 72 40 43 57 40 60 64 39 48 53 52 70 65 43 46 41 61 49 70 51 55 38 51 57 50 51 55 45 56 66 48 37 65 46 37 71 61 69 57 46 72 51 46 41 55 43 41 54 63 59 43 47 72 61 49 64 55 73 58 61 40 48 66 59 39 56 62 43 62 48 45 70 55 70 70 43 60 66 49 38 64 46 61 47 69 37 53 46 65 38 71 46 64 56 53 60 45 57 41 50 43 46 73 40 67 41 66 39 58 71 68 37 48 73 45 46 58 39 44 58 71 46 42 67 57 72 54 55 50 69 37 56 55 66 51 59 46 44 40 69 51 44 37 64 68 44 68 73 56 48 46 54 73 71 57 68 42 64 48 73 60 59 64 48 60 64 41 65 65 59 57 65 49 42 72 73 52 39 43 66 73 54 50 65 65 39 45 51 40 44 72 55 53 72 69 54 71 70 72 56 70 60 48 62 71 65 72 53 50 68 64 67 69 60 54 63 71 37 58 39 65 53 65 59 49 38 68 65 42 69 61 70 56 45 40 62 44 70 44 57 64 65 63 41 49 41 39 56 61 68 73 46 65 71 73 56 54 45 48 55 66 48 45 51 72 41 56 41 50 68 71 58 59 39 40 66 38 71 41 43 51 65 66 53 68 65 56 39 60 48 55 38 57 63 49 58 51 66 61 73 45 59 67 71 52 59 46 61 72 61 62 68 45 73 70 44 61 41 43 73 55 62 37 60 69 38 69 63 49 65 65 62 61 50 40 71 68 69 49 60 64 69 42 53 66 42 57 49 60 51 49 39 71 41 56 56 62 41 46 56 49 41 40 50 57 69 68 50 48 41 62 68 72 62 53 44 57 37 73 67 45 44 37 64 70 61 43 51 52 51 66 43 39 57 63 52 70 70 54 43 71 60 45 57 56 73 58 61 58 69 52 55 52 67 68 53 67 42 48 48 67 40 55 61

Timestamp: 2021-12-29 01:35:56 UTC

[Psybolt]

42

[Bazza]

Infinity

[Old Man]

And beyond

[Bazza]

Infinity is just an idea, so already has a bounds ie can’t go beyond it. 

[Bazza]

What number is infinity? 

[Pariah]

The number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin.

[Bazza]

You do realise that angels are not bound by temporality or number and thus can occupy the same “space” if they choose too? They are basically a unique species of form/idea? 

[Cancer]

Angels are lesser manifestations of the logical singularity that is divinity, and you can accumulate as many impossible things as you want by circulating around such a point in the complex plane.  See Cauchy's residue theorem about that.

[Bazza]

Cauchy's residue theorem involves space, right? If so, then it doesn’t apply due to angels not having a sensible spacial dimension (or three). 

[Cancer]

No, it doesn't involve space.  It is most easily understood (and most commonly explained) via a graphical analogy using the complex plane, which can make it appear that it involves space. 

 

The complex plane is a conventional 2-D graph, where the real part of a complex number is plotted as the x-coordinate and the imaginary part of a complex number is plotted as the y-coordinate.  The real numbers thus lie along the x-axis of the plot, and pure imaginary numbers lie along the y-axis.

[Bazza]

Cheers. As it involves numbers, real & imaginary, I’m out of my depth so can’t answer your assertion. I will say that beings we call angels are explained on ontological grounds using Aristotelean philosophy. Numbers also have an ontological quality, and thus the two theories would need to be adequately reconciled for an answer. 

[Logan D. Hurricanes]

[Cancer]