Jump to content

More space news!


tkdguy

Recommended Posts

Re: More space news!

 

 

Maybe they swarm in packs and rob defenseless perimeter worlds and form impromptu gravity wells in order to charge FTL travellers a toll for passage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: More space news!

 

Based on what this guy can live through ... or this one ... or these ... I won't be placing any bets.

I fear they need a environment a little bit closer to earth to develop first. they are pretty advanced/specialised bacteria and the environment might not even allow simply bacteria to form - so they can never develop to more complex ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: More space news!

 

I fear they need a environment a little bit closer to earth to develop first. they are pretty advanced/specialised bacteria and the environment might not even allow simply bacteria to form - so they can never develop to more complex ones.

If you can state that as a fact then I am absolutely in awe of your knowledge of biology. I would prefer to study a few more independent examples of abiogenesis and evolution before I offered an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: More space news!

 

If you can state that as a fact then I am absolutely in awe of your knowledge of biology. I would prefer to study a few more independent examples of abiogenesis and evolution before I offered an opinion.

I just used my Basic Biology Schoolknowledge about the development of life:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_life

 

It all begins with non-organic processes forming the building blocks of the first organisms. If the environment does not supports these or similar struktures, then life can't start on it's own.

There could still be bacteria imported via meteorites or with a radically different form of DNA-equivalent, but that is unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: More space news!

 

I just used my Basic Biology Schoolknowledge about the development of life:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_life

 

It all begins with non-organic processes forming the building blocks of the first organisms. If the environment does not supports these or similar struktures, then life can't start on it's own.

And last I heard, we had not been able to replicate that process. We do not know the environment that DOES cause abiogeneisis, so it seems a little presumptuous to state categorically that a particular environment CAN NOT support abiogenesis.

 

You may be right, but I really believe you are assuming facts not in evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: More space news!

 

A paper in Nature two months back (12 January issue, volume 481, pp. 167-169) says that the results from gravitational microlensing suggest an average of more than one planet per star, on average, in the Galaxy. They have enough detections (and have done some statistical analysis and simulations) to claim this down to a mass of 5 Earth masses, in the orbit size range 0.5 - 10 AU.

 

Planets around stars in our Galaxy thus seem to be the rule rather than the exception.

 

They don't have numbers for truly Earth-class planets yet, though. So far only the Kepler mission has a handle on that, and they are still in the data-gathering stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: More space news!

 

A paper in Nature two months back (12 January issue' date=' volume 481, pp. 167-169) says that the results from gravitational microlensing suggest an average of more than one planet per star, on average, in the Galaxy. They have enough detections (and have done some statistical analysis and simulations) to claim this down to a mass of 5 Earth masses, in the orbit size range 0.5 - 10 AU.[/quote']

Sweet! Even if we never get to visit any of them, that gives us a large dataset to which we can apply future analysis. If it's possible, I'm guessing we'll find signs of life sooner or later. Of course signs of civilization would be amazing. More planets = more hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: More space news!

 

Multiple planets around most stars in the Galaxy? Wouldn't that tend to blow up Drake's Equation a bit?

Considering that it is an equation consisting mostly of unknowns, I doubt it will cause much of a problem.

 

But here are some intersting news:

 

And "Riding the Booster": From launch to landing, a space shuttle's solid rocket booster journey is captured, with sound mixed and enhanced by Skywalker Sound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: More space news!

 

Multiple planets around most stars in the Galaxy? Wouldn't that tend to blow up Drake's Equation a bit?

One of the factors in the equasion is the number of planets (or moons) per star where life is possible, next factor is on what percentage of these does life actually appear.

 

Attempting to draw a graph from one data point, I say our solar system has 4 life-potent worlds (Earth, Mars, Europa, and Titan), and life is known to have occurred on .25 of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...