BNakagawa

my favorite: Magically Delicious. Physical Limitation. Any magically oriented predator will be drawn to the PC because whatever they think is the most tasty, nutritious or whatever motivates them to hunt, the PC is the best prey they have ever encountered.

Here's one for 6th edition fans. 

Here's one for 6th edition fans. 

my favorite: Magically Delicious. Physical Limitation. Any magically oriented predator will be drawn to the PC because whatever they think is the most tasty, nutritious or whatever motivates them to hunt, the PC is the best prey they have ever encountered.

my favorite: Magically Delicious. Physical Limitation. Any magically oriented predator will be drawn to the PC because whatever they think is the most tasty, nutritious or whatever motivates them to hunt, the PC is the best prey they have ever encountered.

my favorite: Magically Delicious. Physical Limitation. Any magically oriented predator will be drawn to the PC because whatever they think is the most tasty, nutritious or whatever motivates them to hunt, the PC is the best prey they have ever encountered.

Here's one for 6th edition fans. 

Here's one for 6th edition fans. 

The counter argument to not packing the courts is that just letting them run amok is going to do lasting harm right now. In real time.
 
If you limit their ability to erode human rights now, at least it kicks the can down the road and opens up the possibility that things might actually improve. Sure, they could undo things if they ever regain power, but that was going to be the case anyway. 
 
If you're not going to use your temporary advantage to change the situation to redress the obvious injustices done by the other side by refusing to even give Garland a hearing and to ramrod their candidate in record time, what is even the point?

You may not like it, but this is what peak capitalism looks like.

You may not like it, but this is what peak capitalism looks like.

One aspect of the Wiggins trade that hasn't gotten a lot of attention is that he, like Kawhi Leonard, did not want to get vaccinated against Covid-19.
 
Both he and Leonard play for teams that mandated that the unvaxxed would not be allowed to play in their team's home games. After some consultations with the team management, Wiggins ended up getting the jab, while Kawhi did not.
Fast forward and Wiggins was an all star game starter and NBA champion and Leonard's team, picked by many to be the Eastern Conference Champions, ended up swept out of the playoffs.
 
Talent is critical, but being coachable, both on and off the court, makes a huge difference.

I liked 4th/5th ed. 
 
6e disappointed me. They made some sweeping changes and failed to playtest or stress test them adequately.
 
Everyone just shrugs and says it's the GMs responsibility to ban/limit these problems at their tables, but that just worsens one of the most persistant complaints about Champions, is that it puts too much of a load on the GM.

I liked 4th/5th ed. 
 
6e disappointed me. They made some sweeping changes and failed to playtest or stress test them adequately.
 
Everyone just shrugs and says it's the GMs responsibility to ban/limit these problems at their tables, but that just worsens one of the most persistant complaints about Champions, is that it puts too much of a load on the GM.

short answer: republicans.

The counter argument to not packing the courts is that just letting them run amok is going to do lasting harm right now. In real time.
 
If you limit their ability to erode human rights now, at least it kicks the can down the road and opens up the possibility that things might actually improve. Sure, they could undo things if they ever regain power, but that was going to be the case anyway. 
 
If you're not going to use your temporary advantage to change the situation to redress the obvious injustices done by the other side by refusing to even give Garland a hearing and to ramrod their candidate in record time, what is even the point?

The counter argument to not packing the courts is that just letting them run amok is going to do lasting harm right now. In real time.
 
If you limit their ability to erode human rights now, at least it kicks the can down the road and opens up the possibility that things might actually improve. Sure, they could undo things if they ever regain power, but that was going to be the case anyway. 
 
If you're not going to use your temporary advantage to change the situation to redress the obvious injustices done by the other side by refusing to even give Garland a hearing and to ramrod their candidate in record time, what is even the point?

The counter argument to not packing the courts is that just letting them run amok is going to do lasting harm right now. In real time.
 
If you limit their ability to erode human rights now, at least it kicks the can down the road and opens up the possibility that things might actually improve. Sure, they could undo things if they ever regain power, but that was going to be the case anyway. 
 
If you're not going to use your temporary advantage to change the situation to redress the obvious injustices done by the other side by refusing to even give Garland a hearing and to ramrod their candidate in record time, what is even the point?

here's hoping that the GOPs local moves to gain a stranglehold over local and state elections don't grant them the ability to decertify any election results that don't agree with them...