Jump to content

Alternate Name for Fantasy Hero


Armitage

Recommended Posts

Champion is kind of a generic term for any heroic figure fighting for other people - a hero in other words.  And it has instant name recognition.  If the line had always been "x Champions" instead of "x hero" I think it might have helped sales, and still could.  Its not like the content of the book isn't immediately obvious from the cover and the subtitle.  Champions: Super Hero Role Playing (with superheroes blasing up the scenery).  Fantasy Champions: Fantasy Role Playing (with a picture of people fighting a dragon).  Pulp Champions: Adventures in the pulp era (guy in a fedora with a pistol), etc.

 

That way products such as Golden Age and Dark Champions are just part of a whole pattern rather than simply subsets of one genre.

 

I like this idea.

 

You have Champions.

Then Fantasy Champions, Star Champions, Dark Champions as broad based sourcebooks with an inbuilt setting, and from this they could then do more sourcebooks for each game line.

 

They could do a Fantasy Champions Bestiary One, a Star Champions Guide to Spaceships, or a Dark Champions (insert City Name here) sourcebook.... all these just examples of course.

 

Another great idea would be for them to open the system up to the OGL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this idea.

 

You have Champions.

Then Fantasy Champions, Star Champions, Dark Champions as broad based sourcebooks with an inbuilt setting, and from this they could then do more sourcebooks for each game line.

 

They could do a Fantasy Champions Bestiary One, a Star Champions Guide to Spaceships, or a Dark Champions (insert City Name here) sourcebook.... all these just examples of course.

 

Another great idea would be for them to open the system up to the OGL.

 

The problem with OGL (as WotC Discovered) is that once the Genie is out of the bag, you no control over the quality of the complete and utter shit 3rd party companies come up with.

 

Granted, in some cases (such as Pathfinder) the 3rd party stuff is BETTER than what WotC put out, but in many cases it was literally shit made out of paper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with OGL (as WotC Discovered) is that once the Genie is out of the bag, you no control over the quality of the complete and utter shit 3rd party companies come up with.

 

Granted, in some cases (such as Pathfinder) the 3rd party stuff is BETTER than what WotC put out, but in many cases it was literally shit made out of paper.

 

But "Foundation: A World in Black and White" was an excellent d20 superhero game.  Far better than the later Mutants & Masterminds.  How can you not admire a game that includes heroines' cup sizes in their descriptions?

 

(Yes, I'm being sarcastic.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see no big difference between shite companies and shite individuals putting out stuff on their own, especially in this day and age of PDF and POD, where most "companies" are single individuals anyway. So if you really want to follow that line of thought, you'd have to curtail hobbyist productions, too. At which point you're really creating a rift between you and your customers.

 

Yes, bad products might "pollute your brand", but you'd need enough 3rd party support to have that issue in the first place, "1st world problems" as the kids say nowadays. If you're not Apple or WotC...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with OGL (as WotC Discovered) is that once the Genie is out of the bag, you no control over the quality of the complete and utter shit 3rd party companies come up with.

 

Granted, in some cases (such as Pathfinder) the 3rd party stuff is BETTER than what WotC put out, but in many cases it was literally shit made out of paper.

 

I can understand that point and I think that in the last 14 years a lot of people have become well aware of this and the overall quality of OGL products have improved quite a bit... especially after Pathfinder came out.

 

A lot of killer things have come to exist because of the OGL and the good always rises from the crud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand that point and I think that in the last 14 years a lot of people have become well aware of this and the overall quality of OGL products have improved quite a bit... especially after Pathfinder came out.

 

A lot of killer things have come to exist because of the OGL and the good always rises from the crud.

 

Occasionally those turds had a diamond in them.

 

Can't remember which OGL supplement I found it in, but when handling large-scale warfare where the PCs are contributing to their own little portion (think Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli at Helmsdeep) use the following (and I paraphrase since I can't remember it word for word):

 

At the end of each turn (or each day if the party is traveling) Roll Xd10s. Whenever a 10 is rolled, take away that die. Whenever a 1 is rolled, put a die back in the pool. If all the dice are gone, the battle is lost.

 

Where there is overwhelming opposition, take away a die on either a 9 and a 10, and you cannot regain dice unless you roll two ones during the same roll.

 

I've made great use of this for Helm's deep like battles or for when two armies clash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I read a lot of good alternative names.

How about Heroes of Legend or Legendary Heroes or Mystical Champions?

People have complained for years that Dark Champions is a horrible name because it sounds like a genre book for playing Iron Age or "gritty" Batman or Punisher style superheroes when it's actually a genre book for running modern action adventure from spies to military to vigilantes.  Now imagine if they named something Mystical Champions.  It sounds like a source book for magical superheroes akin to the "Ultimate Mystic".  There would be no end to the complaints about how misleading and/or inappropriate the title is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People have complained for years that Dark Champions is a horrible name because it sounds like a genre book for playing Iron Age or "gritty" Batman or Punisher style superheroes when it's actually a genre book for running modern action adventure from spies to military to vigilantes.  Now imagine if they named something Mystical Champions.  It sounds like a source book for magical superheroes akin to the "Ultimate Mystic".  There would be no end to the complaints about how misleading and/or inappropriate the title is.

There is a big difference between the two. 

 

In 4th edition, the book Dark Champions was about playing Iron Age or "gritty" Batman or Punisher style superheroes. That was why many of us objected and thought it was confusing. If the previous book hadn't existed, there would have been less objection.  Although I think the fact that many of the genres that are covered by Dark Champions are not what I would consider dark. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Attaching "Champions" to it would still be problematic.  Champions Beyond is set in the Champions Universe but Mystic Champions is a generic fantasy book that has nothing to do with Champions?  We're still seeing people confused by Champions/Champions Complete/Champions Universe and whether they need the out of print 2 book "core" rules. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the entire line was renamed "x champions" then the confusion would be significantly reduced.  And as rjcurrie notes, the confusion with Dark Champions is mostly the fact that it WAS originally for gritty champions adventures.  Its like naming a shoe company Nike then expanding it to include wedding dresses and car parts.  People are going to associate it with shoes.

Plus, there's nothing innately "dark" about spy or modern adventures, but the name is in there.  So its more the "dark" part that's the confusing bit than the "champions" part, I suspect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...