Jump to content

Would you fly on a 737 Max? Round 2...


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Ternaugh said:

 

Management issues.  Boeing management has been cheaping out on anything they can, especially staffing.  That's why they're starting to have issues like leaving tools behind in fuel tanks during construction.  Even the original MCAS issue could have been avoided with a training program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost certainly the latter.

 

When McDonnell-Douglass bought Boeing with Boeing's money, the business-type sleazebags took over, and imposed their version of management (which had nearly taken McD-D down the toilet in the first place).  And that version is: you don't have to know anything to manage, you just have to push people around and make them do what you say, simply because you say it.  This is in direct opposition to the old core of Boeing, which was solidly in the Build Airplanes Right camp.  Nothing shows this as clearly as the 787 fiasco, and I know a now-retired Boeing engineer who was on that project and all but predicted the outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And things might be getting uglier.

 

From NYT:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/11/business/faa-boeing-737-boeing-max-investigation.html?unlocked_article_code=1.M00.Yydy.CPBMKcMpfaEs&smid=url-share

 

Quote

The Federal Aviation Administration on Thursday said it had opened an investigation into whether Boeing failed to ensure that its 737 Max 9 plane was safe and manufactured to match the design approved by the agency.

 

The F.A.A. said the investigation stemmed from the loss of a fuselage panel of a Boeing 737 Max 9 operated by Alaska Airlines shortly after it took off on Friday from Portland, Ore., leaving a hole in the side of the passenger cabin. The plane returned to Portland for an emergency landing.

 

“This incident should have never happened and it cannot happen again,” the agency said.

 

If this is atop the prior mess with the MAX?  Wow.  

 

Boeing stock's down 10% in the last week, and about 15% overall since mid-December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, unclevlad said:

And now there's a class action suit filed against Boeing on behalf of the passengers on the flight.  It was only a matter of when.

 

The FAA has launched a formal investigation into the construction practices at Boeing and its subcontractors as they relate to all these recent incidents.

 

This isn't going away any time soon.  Maybe it'll force a culture change at Boeing corporate, but I doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 1/24/2024 at 6:00 PM, Old Man said:

757s haven't been in production for years, so at least that incident is a maintenance issue.

 

Which is not to say that everything is hunky-dory at Boeing.  The engineers are starting to talk to the press.

 

Only in a sense.

 

<oops...just realized I had the wrong link, deleted it...>

 

I say "in a sense" because the story states...the plane itself was put into service in 1992...making it 30 years old.  Typical...not absolute...lifespan's given as 20-25 years.  OK, it's quite likely that planes flew much less frequently during the pandemic, but still...  That opens up the question of whether it should still be in the air.

 

And yeah...if that story that Boeing was responsible for the mis-installation...that's putting the entire thing back in Boeing's lap.

 

The problem is, tho...those 757s are nearing their EOLs.  What's gonna replace them...new Boeing planes????  But who else *can* replace them?  AFAIK Airbus is totally booked up, and there is NO ONE else.  Nor is this an area where someone can enter the market easily.  That's quite likely a big part of Boeing's problem.  They almost *can't* be held accountable.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/05/new-quality-glitch-to-delay-some-boeing-737-max-deliveries.html

 

50 planes have mis-drilled holes?  50????

 

And QC found the problem on a HORRIFYINGLY large percentage.  Boeing claims it's not a safety issue...but that's also a self-serving statement.  Worse, even if true, THAT OFTEN that the construction does not meet standards?

 

Toss the board.  The whole bleeping board.  This is far too many serious QC issues in too short a period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.npr.org/2024/02/06/1229528737/ntsb-boeing-737-max-9-alaska-airlines-door-plug-missing-bolts

 

Quote

In its 19-page report, the NTSB says four bolts that were supposed to hold the door plug in place were not recovered. Nevertheless, investigators say "the observed damage patterns and absence of contact damage" on the door panel and plane itself indicate the four bolts were "missing" before the door plug was ejected from the plane.


The door plug was originally installed by contractor Spirit AeroSystems in Wichita, Kan., and then shipped to Boeing's factory in Renton, Wash., for assembly. Once it arrived in Washington, the NTSB says damaged rivets were discovered on the fuselage that required the door plug to be opened for repairs. After that work was completed by Spirit AeroSystems personnel at the Boeing plant, the bolts were not reinstalled, according to photo evidence provided to the NTSB by Boeing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...