Jump to content

More space news!


tkdguy

Recommended Posts

A paper came out here (Nature Geophysics, open access) based on results from the Chinese Chang'e-5 mission (among others) about glass beads formed in meteorite impacts on the Moon contain some water, and then folks have run with it in terms of that being a water supply for a Moon colony.  Interesting stuff, but nowhere near as large a resource as one might think.

 

They're estimating about 3 * 10^14 kg over the whole lunar surface (actually 10% less than that, but I'm being sloppy here to make a point).  Impact debris is pretty evenly spread over the Moon, so if you should probably assume a uniform spread over that whole surface, and then on average you have roughly 8 million kg of water per square kilometer, or 8 kg per square meter.  That's 8 liters per square meter, so that if you imagine this as water in uniform pool form covering the surface ... the water is 8 millimeters deep.  And that's a non-renewable resource (more precisely, renewable over geologic times).  

 

For a decent Moon base you're going to have harvest a pretty large area to get enough water to sustain the people in it, and process it at high efficiency, and once you've got it you're going to have to be assiduous about recycling it.

 

Not impossible, but you're starting to get into handwavium-level extrapolations that sound good in science fiction but don't stand up when you think about realizing that technology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Radio astronomers find evidence that a rocky exoplanet has a magnetic field. Does that meanb it's held its atmosphere despite being so close to its star? That's more of a stretch. And it's a searing-hot planet. But since rocky planets (probably) need magnetic fields to keep atmospheres over geological time, this is one step forward to finding planets that might support life as we known it.

 

Repeating radio signal leads astronomers to an Earth-size exoplanet (msn.com)

 

(Story contains link to paper in Nature Astronomy.)

 

Dean Shomshak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bad News: the FAA is dragging it's feet and will not clear for the launch until May 31 at the earliest:

https://www.investors.com/news/technology/spacex-faa-blows-out-candle-on-company-starship/


EDIT:  The FAA Completed their Environmental Review in 2022, and the curren tlaunch window is April 17th ior 18th

Edited by Scott Ruggels
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An item in mainstream news has reported that a supermassive black hole (in another galaxy) has been found after its ejection from the center of that galaxy.

 

The technical journal paper from which that item comes is here; open access, but this is unleavened technical stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hadn't realized before this morning that they were using 39 separate but coordinated engines in that vehicle.  That makes this a much more complicated problem than I had thought.  The Soviet N1 rocket had 30 separate engines, and (admittedly 50+ years ago) the design difficulties could not be overcome.  One of the four launch failures destroyed the launch complex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Cancer said:

I hadn't realized before this morning that they were using 39 separate but coordinated engines in that vehicle.  That makes this a much more complicated problem than I had thought.  The Soviet N1 rocket had 30 separate engines, and (admittedly 50+ years ago) the design difficulties could not be overcome.  One of the four launch failures destroyed the launch complex.

33 on 1st stage, and 6 on the 2nd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...