Jump to content

"Neat" Pictures


Dr. Anomaly

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 19.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cygnia

    1904

  • Logan D. Hurricanes

    1200

  • Cancer

    1173

  • SteveZilla

    875

Re: "Neat" Pictures

 

I've wondered at times what percentage of a cargo ship's capacity is used up just by the weight of the steel of the containers' date=' and if it might be more economical to use a lighter metal, like Aluminum.[/quote']

 

Is steel used because the containers made from it already exist, it is more durable than aluminum, both reasons, or neither?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: "Neat" Pictures

 

Is steel used because the containers made from it already exist' date=' it is more durable than aluminum, both reasons, or neither?[/quote']

This is one of those great questions that you probably won't find in a google search. My somewhat educated guess is that the biggest reason is just the difference in the price of the metals. It may have to do with durability and strength too.

 

Added: Of course if you do a google search you will find some interesting things like shipping container homes.

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]38004[/ATTACH]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: "Neat" Pictures

 

Added: Of course if you do a google search you will find some interesting things like shipping container homes.

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]38004[/ATTACH]

 

Wild. There's a subdivision not too far from here where the condos look *exactly* like that. Floor plans and everything. Pretty sure they weren't built out of shipping containers, but the resemblance is uncanny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: "Neat" Pictures

 

Is steel used because the containers made from it already exist' date=',,[/quote']

 

So, because some containers are made out of X, we should continue to always use X to make new containers? ;)

 

... it is more durable than aluminum' date=' both reasons, or neither?[/quote']

 

I can only think that to use aluminum would make the containers cost more (pure conjecture), since it is possible (afaik) to make an aluminum structure with the same strength* as a steel one, yet still be lighter. And less weight would mean less stress on the cranes that load/unload, and the rail & road system that carries them across land.

 

*Excluding the endurance limit of aluminum -- we're talking about transporting cargo and not people after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...