Jump to content

In other news...


tkdguy

Recommended Posts

Well, it wasn't like this wasn't being done already, this only makes it official. :angel:  :no:

Well the ISP's have tried and gotten caught when it was illegal and had to pay fines. 

 

Now we don't even get that. 

 

Now that corporations are better than people I guess this is the march to the future. Looks like Japanese Neo-Corp future is probably more likely than nuclear holocaust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Along similar lines this article may help you deal with the ISP's buying and selling of our internet souls

 

https://medium.freecodecamp.com/how-to-set-up-a-vpn-in-5-minutes-for-free-and-why-you-urgently-need-one-d5cdba361907

 

I do recommend the https everywhere extension, it's invisible and you only get notifications if the site has no https option.

As far as pay VPN services I've never tried them. But I'm going to be quite soon

 

Looking at Tunnel Bear first. Anyone have experiences? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Along similar lines this article may help you deal with the ISP's buying and selling of our internet souls

 

https://medium.freecodecamp.com/how-to-set-up-a-vpn-in-5-minutes-for-free-and-why-you-urgently-need-one-d5cdba361907

 

I do recommend the https everywhere extension, it's invisible and you only get notifications if the site has no https option.

As far as pay VPN services I've never tried them. But I'm going to be quite soon

 

Looking at Tunnel Bear first. Anyone have experiences? 

 

This dude is preparing to buy and publish the browsing histories of the scumbags responsible for destroying our online privacy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In response to the Feds repeal of FCC Internet Privacy Protections (thanks GOP) Minnesota goes for state issued protections.

 

https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/blog/2017/03/minnesota-senate-votes-58-9-pass-internet-privacy-protections-response-repeal-fcc-privacy-rules/

 

The pros? Yay! Can't sell Info! Can't refuse to provide service to those who won't sign off on sale of ISP information.

 

The Cons? Does leave the door open for privacy to become a "product" we have to pay them to not sell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

When I read this article I was very upset.  Heck, I was fighting mad.

 

When I read dug a little deeper the next day and discovered that the FCC rule that the Republicans were repealing only dates back to October and wasn't scheduled to go into effect until December 2017, my feeling were strongly mixed.  I was relieved that to learn that the only effect of the repeal was to maintain the status quo and pissed as all get out at the EFF for deceiving me.  

 

The broadband privacy rules approved last October appear to be very good rules, and the fact that the Republicans are repealing them is messed up.  We should be upset about this.  However, these were new rules that hadn't even taken effect yet.  So if your ISP hasn't in all these years already sold your browsing history (and they haven't) the repeal of some rules that hadn't even gone into effect yet, isn't going to make it happen now.  This article was making it out like the one law that had been stopping ISPs from selling our browser history for years had just been axed by the new Republican congress.  Really, that what I thought had happened after I read the article.  This isn't accidental.  This particular article doesn't mention that the broadband privacy rules were very recent, and none of the EFF articles that I saw mentioned that the rules being repealed weren't scheduled to take take effect until December.

 

I am calling fear-mongering on this, and fear-mongering is suppose to be a Trump thing not one of our things.  :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...