Jump to content

Worst action movie clichés


Starlord

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Cassandra said:

The Villain never shoots the Hero in the head no matter who close the range.

 

My favorite scene in the classic "To Live and Die in L.A." where the main character gets totally blown away 3/4ths through the movie... and nope... nothing saving poor Richard Chance in that one... dead, dead, dead.


That was so shocking to see that happen in a movie like that, where the expected cliché's didn't come into play.

 

God I love that movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

Another peeve... worthless body armor on faceless enemies or police/soldiers.


This happens all the time... where the "faceless NPCs" on either side of a big fight... either the sinister badguys in their all black tactical gear... or a nameless SWAT or soldiers backing up the protagonist... their body armor does nothing. Single shots from pistols and such just drop them with ease, and the only purpose of the gear is to hide the faces of the stunt men playing the parts so they can be reused again and again.

 

 

Yeah, armor or no armor, it's pretty common for un-named characters to just die instantly whenever they're shot with anything, regardless of weapon type or hit location . . . while the hero can take a shot and just slow down a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Yeah, armor or no armor, it's pretty common for un-named characters to just die instantly whenever they're shot with anything, regardless of weapon type or hit location . . . while the hero can take a shot and just slow down a little.


Which is the origin of the "one hit and they stay down" agent rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, death tribble said:

Does the same hold true for Olympus Has Fallen ?

 

No. Olympus Has Fallen showed us the tactics of the attack on the White House.  First there was the airstrike clearing away the snipers, then a breaching charge to knock down the gate, followed by an assault on the front with heavy machine gun support.

 

The only thing I question is how they South Korean's got knifes in the bunker.

 

The system for disarming the nuclear weapons was poorly thought out (what if the President is out of the country when they need to shut down the missiles?), and nuclear warheads on ICBMs won't go off until the missile is in flight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Cassandra said:

The Villain shoots the Hero in the chest and the bullet is deflected by an item someone gave him at the start of the film.

 

There was one time where James Bond (in the book) knew that the assassin who had him covered with a pistol was an incredible shot, so while the assassin was monologuing (of course) Bond shifted his suitcoat to put his cigarette case over his heart.  Wouldn't have helped against a head shot, sure, but at least it was semi-plausible that the cigarette case was in the right spot at the right time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, RDU Neil said:

 

I half watched White House Down seemed to have its tongue firmly planted in cheek... as bad as it was, it didn't take itself seriously. Olympus Has Fallen was just plain dumb awful.

 

You'd think the Secret Service could tell the difference between microphones and silencers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Cassandra said:

 

You'd think the Secret Service could tell the difference between microphones and silencers.

 

That was where it really fell down (pun intended) for me. It was another cliché, "bad guys tactics work only because initial good guy forces are dumb/incompetent..." Like running out on to the front porch of the White House, directly into a hail of automatic gun fire (and the fact that so many well equipped attackers could get so close to the White House front gate in the first place... seriously... c'mon.) Yes, the evil-bad Korean's had tactics, but they ultimately only succeeded due to asleep-at-the-wheel Secret Service, which is just bad writing and reduces any dramatic impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BoloOfEarth said:

 

There was one time where James Bond (in the book) knew that the assassin who had him covered with a pistol was an incredible shot, so while the assassin was monologuing (of course) Bond shifted his suitcoat to put his cigarette case over his heart.  Wouldn't have helped against a head shot, sure, but at least it was semi-plausible that the cigarette case was in the right spot at the right time. 

 

It helps that the bullet it had to stop was a .25 caliber dum-dum with absolutely miserable penetration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RDU Neil said:

 

That was where it really fell down (pun intended) for me. It was another cliché, "bad guys tactics work only because initial good guy forces are dumb/incompetent..." Like running out on to the front porch of the White House, directly into a hail of automatic gun fire (and the fact that so many well equipped attackers could get so close to the White House front gate in the first place... seriously... c'mon.) Yes, the evil-bad Korean's had tactics, but they ultimately only succeeded due to asleep-at-the-wheel Secret Service, which is just bad writing and reduces any dramatic impact.

 

And they never really gave us a reason why Dylan McDermott was a traitor.  At least James Woods had a brain tumor no doubt brought about from the 30 cups of coffee he starts the day with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes and no. While there's none of this "bad guy chivalry" in real life when it comes right down to it, not every fight will involve every opposing combatant immediately ganging up on one guy that stands against them (some people are more cautious/scared than others and some people are wise enough to not move in close as their buddy is swinging a weapon that could hit THEM on the back swing).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then there is the anime Durarara,  when the first guy gets punched an goes airborne across the street.  The rest of you and your buddies don't have fight left in you.  But, then you were dumb to stand up to the guy who was throwing vending machines like it was a track&field sport, so you get what you deserve.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, death tribble said:

Don't get me started about people hunting Ewoks.........

 

Speaking of action movie cliches and Star Wars: JJ Abrams. The man thinks the frenetic-kinetic breakneck pace of superhero films will translate to everything he touches. His technique is to hit the beats, tropes, and quips at 100+ mph without paying attention to anything else. Some stories need time for the story to breath, the characters to resonate, and the mythology to build. A movie can contain a lot of action and not be a cheeky formulaic action blockbuster. Abrams hand in Star Wars and Star Trek has been detrimental to both because there is something more to both of them. The worst action movie cliche I can think of these days is "Directed by JJ Abrams."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...