Jump to content

Political Discussion Thread (With Rules)


Simon

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, Dr. MID-Nite said:

 

I have no words really. Absolutely disgusting. America creates this. Sigh....

And I'm afraid it's only going to get worse before it gets any better.  Especially since it seems a great many people don't seem to be interested in preventing it from getting worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See what bothers me is that Israel and it's supporters have been swearing up and down that HAMAS has hidden tunnels to smuggle weapons and such into Gaza Strip, tunnels which Israel has yet to find.  So if HAMAS can smuggle weapons and other gear into Gaza without the Israelis noticing, wouldn't it stand to reason they could smuggle themselves out of Gaza Strip once their dirty deeds were done? I'm just saying, if the Israeli stories of smuggling tunnels are true and accurate the HAMAS agents would have little reason to actually stick around in Gaza would they? I mean it's a horrifying thought but maybe we have to address the possibility that the actual terrorists have already gotten away and the bombing is happening anyhow because the Israeli government just doesn't care?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there is one bit of news in the Gaza situation that gives me hope it won't spiral into maximum possible bad, it's what the BBC reporter in Israel (I think it was Tim Franks) said yesterday: In his interviews, Mr Franks finds that many Israelis do not hold all Palestinians, or even all Gazans, complicit in the attack by Hamas. They do not want to see collective punishment.

 

Some commentary I have seen seems to forget that neither Israelis nor Palestinians are hive minds, and I try to resist slipping into this myself.

 

Dean Shomshak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim Jordan fails to win the vote of 20 Republicans for Speaker, so...we still have no Speaker.  

 

How this is gonna go...no one knows.  Democratic challengers in swing districts are already using votes for Jordan as ammunition:

From a floor reporter:


 

Quote

I just spoke with Christina Bohannan, a Democrat who is challenging Mariannette Miller-Meeks in Iowa’s 1st congressional district. She views Miller-Meeks’s vote for Jordan as out of step with Iowans in her district. She notes that Jordan has never voted for a farm bill, which couldn’t be more critical to the state. And she notes that more than 60 percent of Iowans reject his extreme position in support of a nationwide abortion ban. Her comments are a reminder of how Democrats think that the chaos and extremism on display in the House will help them win back control in 2024.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DShomshak said:

If there is one bit of news in the Gaza situation that gives me hope it won't spiral into maximum possible bad, it's what the BBC reporter in Israel (I think it was Tim Franks) said yesterday: In his interviews, Mr Franks finds that many Israelis do not hold all Palestinians, or even all Gazans, complicit in the attack by Hamas. They do not want to see collective punishment.

 

Some commentary I have seen seems to forget that neither Israelis nor Palestinians are hive minds, and I try to resist slipping into this myself.

 

Dean Shomshak

 

One commentator I follow noted that the Israeli government has recently modified its rhetoric around this event. Initially they indicated they were planning swift, direct, and forceful retaliation. Now they're stating that they are considering multiple plans of response, suggesting that the initial heat of passion is starting to die down. Internationally, countries that expressed support for whatever course Israel would take immediately after the attack, are now calling for restraint and measured action, which may also be having an effect.

 

1 hour ago, unclevlad said:

Jim Jordan fails to win the vote of 20 Republicans for Speaker, so...we still have no Speaker.  

 

How this is gonna go...no one knows.  Democratic challengers in swing districts are already using votes for Jordan as ammunition:

From a floor reporter:

 

 

Here to your North it looks like campaigning by Democrats has been rather lackluster and haphazard so far. Their biggest cause for optimism in 2024 appears to be how badly the Republicans are shooting themselves in the foot.

Edited by Lord Liaden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone posted notice of this yet? There's so much news, I lose track but it matters.

 

https://www.pressherald.com/2023/10/16/judge-pushes-back-against-trumps-claims-that-gag-order-in-election-case-is-unfair/

 

I was amused that Judge Chutkan used almost the exact words UncleVlad did, that "no other criminal defendant would be allowed" to smear and attack prosecutors and court personnel as Trump has, "And I'm not going to allow it in this case.".

 

I can only speculate, but I would imagine that to Mr Trump, being told flat-out he isn't special must scald like acid. Assuming his ego even lets him hear the statement.

 

Dean Shomshak

28 minutes ago, Lord Liaden said:

Here to your North it looks like campaigning by Democrats has been rather lackluster and haphazard so far.

So, same as usual. <eyeroll>

 

"I belong to no organized political party; I am a Democrat." -- Will Rogers

 

Dean Shomshak

Edited by DShomshak
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DShomshak said:

Has anyone posted notice of this yet? There's so much news, I lose track but it matters.

 

https://www.pressherald.com/2023/10/16/judge-pushes-back-against-trumps-claims-that-gag-order-in-election-case-is-unfair/

 

I was amused that Judge Chutkan used almost the exact words UncleVlad did, that "no other criminal defendant would be allowed" to smear and attack prosecutors and court personnel as Trump has, "And I'm not going to allow it in this case.".

 

I can only speculate, but I would imagine that to Mr Trump, being told flat-out he isn't special must scald like acid. Assuming his ego even lets him hear the statement.

 

Dean Shomshak

 

 

Didn't see it, but...honestly, I can't consider this news.  Not any more.  It's a given...as inevitable as sunrise and as predictable.  And after...how long now?  Rising to the level of reflexive...well, no later than the election fraud BS cases.  Probably before, but I have no desire to dredge back through the cesspool that is Trump's history to try to pinpoint a date.  

 

I think I stole those words...if not from her order, from articles reporting on the order.  Maybe not, but it's not like it's some deep philosophical revelation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jail would be unlikely, given the need for accommodating Trump's Secret Service detail. But house arrest is quite possible. And fines, as high and as many as the law allows - Trump's wallet is pretty light right now.

 

Is it legal for the court to confiscate all of Trump's Internet-enabled devices? Or to block access to his ISP(s)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he's in detention, barring all communication ought to be legal. Maybe the Secret Service could be relieved during his incarceration.  House arrest would be easier, but since he lives in a mansion, it's not much of a punishment. He's already trying to raise money to pay for whatever fines he may be imposed with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DShomshak said:

I was amused that Judge Chutkan used almost the exact words UncleVlad did, that "no other criminal defendant would be allowed" to smear and attack prosecutors and court personnel as Trump has, "And I'm not going to allow it in this case.".

 

Come to think of it, I've never seen unclevlad and Judge Chutkan in the same place at the same time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tkdguy said:

If he's in detention, barring all communication ought to be legal. Maybe the Secret Service could be relieved during his incarceration.  House arrest would be easier, but since he lives in a mansion, it's not much of a punishment. He's already trying to raise money to pay for whatever fines he may be imposed with.

 

The Secret Service coverage is part of being a former President.  Trump can waive it, but until he does, it's pretty hard to see it getting removed.  And Trump's never going to let it go.

 

If Trump is convicted of fraud...there, I don't know.  It'd be unknown territory, but the Secret Service protection *for life* is embodied into Federal law.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Former_Presidents_Act

 

But we haven't had a president convicted of anything.  Yet.

 

2 hours ago, Lord Liaden said:

Is it legal for the court to confiscate all of Trump's Internet-enabled devices? Or to block access to his ISP(s)?

 

In jail?  I think so.  House arrest?  Maybe, if Trump showed consistent, willful disregard for the gag order.  Probably not initially.  Some of this is the excellent wording of the judge's order...Trump can rant about Biden, about the government generally, about whatever he wants...as long as those rants are NOT connected to the case.  She nicely staked out her proper territory...and nothing more.

 

In other news, in the insane asylum on top of the hill, no second vote today.  Report is Jordan's needing more time to try to change enough votes, so no vote until at least tomorrow.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, unclevlad said:

 

Didn't see it, but...honestly, I can't consider this news.  Not any more.  It's a given...as inevitable as sunrise and as predictable.  And after...how long now?  Rising to the level of reflexive...well, no later than the election fraud BS cases.  Probably before, but I have no desire to dredge back through the cesspool that is Trump's history to try to pinpoint a date.  

 

I think I stole those words...if not from her order, from articles reporting on the order.  Maybe not, but it's not like it's some deep philosophical revelation.

The article was in today's newspaper, so the gag order should be fairly new. OTOH the article mentioned this is the second narrow gag order placed on Trump, so judges may be using a standard phrasing. I'm not looking back to check, either.

 

Dean Shomshak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From NYT.  The story is about rising concern that this clown show is going to cost the Republicans the House in '24.

 

Quote

“It hurts the country; it hurts the Congress; it’s hurting our party,” said Representative Don Bacon of Nebraska, one of 18 Republicans who represent districts won by Mr. Biden in 2020. “It’s putting us in a bad hole for next November.”

 

He said his hard-right colleagues who moved to oust Speaker Kevin McCarthy earlier this month and touched off the intractable scramble to replace him “want to be in the minority.”

 

Mr. Bacon added: “I think they would prefer that. So they can just vote no and just yell and scream all the time.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...